Saturday, December 31, 2016

Mainstream Media's Dishonest Collusion Against University of Minnesota's Football Players.

      Ten football players from the University of Minnesota's Gophers were suspended in September over a sexual assault accusation by a female student and her mother. Despite finding no evidence that there was actually assault in the report, (quite the contrary as we will further demonstrate) the University and the media still put these students on blast claiming that she was more "believable" over a redacted (censored) report that they kept private and didn't want to disclose.  The original report is over 80 pages, but after they redacted it, it was released as a 20 pages version of the same report. What were they hiding?


Here are a few media sources basically copying and pasting from each other trying to paint these students as guilt and nowhere do they mention the fact that this girl basically lied, which we will share in this blog article, so the reader can verify that this is yet another case of regret group sex by the female.


Here is a report by USNews:

"The school suspended the 10 players after completing its own investigation, the results of which it kept private, citing federal privacy laws. But a local TV station published a redacted copy of the 82-page report which quoted the woman as saying she believed 10 to 20 men had sex with her, though she was not certain. She told university investigators she was too traumatized to clearly remember events.
The report concluded that the victim's account of that night was more credible than the players it interviewed, and said some players tried to impede the university's investigation into the incident."
Here's one by The Chicago Tribune's report, which is identical to the previous one, and here is the ESPN report, yet another identical one.
None of these mainstream media reports provide a link to the court documents(although I was able to obtain them doing some extensive searching from a local news station).

The media also conveniently leaves out the fact that the accuser's mother was the one who initially claimed her daughter was raped and then the so-called victim seems to have been pressured to report it to the police by her mom.

Here are the damning screenshots from the actual report where we can see that the media and University are lying intentionally:














After opening up the court documents in the University of Minnesota sexual assault case, the first red flag is that the woman who claims she was sexually assaulted did not want to file a report and her mother was the one who called the police to try to file the report.

So it could be a case of where her mother found out she was having consensual group sex with these football players and she got embarrassed and claimed she was raped.




She admits they were flirting with her, she explains in detail about how she still decided to go back to one of the guy's apartment knowing he was interested in her. Now how can she remember all of this stuff if she claims she was too intoxicated to consent to sex? Also why can't she "remember" how many of the guys she slept with?






So she gets onto the guy's bed and magically she loses her memory and doesn't remember how her clothes got off, but she does remember giving him/them blowjobs but doesn't explain how any of them supposedly forced her to give them blowjobs. She admits she was trying to get him/them to ejaculate.




Here's that magical selective memory at work again. She says she might have been held down by the guys but doesn't remember whether it was real or just her fear that invented the memory.




SHE THEN AGREED TO GO BACK TO THE ROOM WITH THE GUY WHO SHE CLAIMS RAPED HER AGAIN AND HE ASKED HER IF SHE WAS COOL WITH THE GROUP SEX. If she's in "fear" of these guys then why would she go back to one of their rooms?





Here we go. She admits on pg 13 that she sat on the couch in between the guys and started "flirting" with them. Notice how they don't go into detail about what she said specifically while flirting with them? Sneaky sneaky.






She has now changed her mind and said that the sex with some of the boys "might" have been consensual but with the others it wasn't. Boy oh boy you gotta love this chick's selective memory.




Still on page 13 here and LOOK at how the police are white knighting for this chick and basically giving her the go ahead to change her story. 



Ok pay close attention to this part of the documents. In this part they describe what happened in the video footage of the incident captured by one of the football players. The police say she doesn't appear to be too intoxicated to not know what's going on, she doesn't appear to be objecting to any of the sex and the entire video is sexually playful on both ends. This important piece of the story was also left out of the media reports! 





The police then go on to describe the part of the video where she is giving one of the players a blowjob while the other player is penetrating her from behind and they say it appears to be consensual once again. She isn't slurring her words or objecting to anything in the video and is fully conscious of what is going on.



Ok the football player that she admits she probably had consensual sex with said that when she first started flirting with them she brought up the idea of having a threesome with three guys and so they offered to take her up to their apartment which she then consented to.

This is what the accuser meant when she said she "flirted" with them but strangely the police didn't seem to want to make her go into detail about what she said when she flirted with them. 





The football player by the name of Carlton showed the cops his video footage of the incident and the cops agreed that it did appear that she was conscious and a willing participant in the sex during the entire video.

 Even after reviewing the redacted information itself, we can read as to why the mainstream media concealed all the major facts we now know about this case and how this young woman lied about these young men, and still the media and the report itself, keep referring to her "victim".  

It makes one wonder what the entire 82 pages report actually reveals when the 20 pages that were censored pretty tells us she consented to everything that happened



Even after reviewing the redacted information itself, we can read as to why the mainstream media concealed all the major facts we now know about this case and how this young woman lied about these young men, and still the media and the report itself, keep referring to her "victim".


It makes one wonder what the entire 82 pages report actually reveals when the 20 pages that were censored pretty tells us she consented to everything that happened











Saturday, December 24, 2016

A Huge Number of Women Have Children by Multiple Fathers.

Another one of those very revealing studies that are usually quietly reported and not picked up in considerable interest by the mainstream media was reported by the University of Michigan  back in 2011.  This particular study reveals the rates in which women are more and more than before, becoming mothers of children by multiple men. This is quite the slap in the face of our gynocentric society that keeps telling men, we can't keep it in our pants and are sexually irresponsible:
"The first national study of the prevalence of multiple partner fertility shows that 28 percent of all U.S. women with two or more children have children by more than one man.
She (Dorius) found that having children by different fathers was more common among minority women, with 59 percent of African American mothers, 35 percent of Hispanic mothers and 22 percent of white mothers with two or more children reporting multiple partner fertility. Women who were not living with a man when they gave birth and those with low income and less education were also more likely to have children by different men.

But she also found that multiple partner fertility is surprisingly common at all levels of income and education and is frequently tied to marriage and divorce rather than just single parenthood."


    And this research should be partnered up with the one that we previously posted that paternity fraud is 30% of all paternity. So a lot of these children these women have by multiple fathers are potentially children they are forced to either raise or pay child support for, or are children they aren't currently aware are theirs.




Monday, November 7, 2016

Radical Lesbian Feminist Alice Walker Hated Children and "Reclaimed" the Words "Slut" and "Nigger"

Alice Walker on her support for the Slutwalk and claiming the word "slut" as a positive thing:

"Guernica: Have you been following the 'SlutWalk' protests, the international movement borne out of remarks made by a Toronto police officer that 'women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not be victimized?' What are you thoughts on the movement?

Alice Walker: I’ve always understood the word 'slut' to mean a woman who freely enjoys her own sexuality in any way she wants to; undisturbed by other people’s wishes for her behavior. Sexual desire originates in her and is directed by her. In that sense it is a word well worth retaining. As a poet, I find it has a rich, raunchy, elemental, down to earth sound, that connects us to something primal, moist, and free."

https://www.guernicamag.com/daily/michael_archer_qa_with_alice_w/

And here she is claiming that the word used to oppress black men is something positive despite her depictions being nothing but stereotypical:

"I’ve always understood the word 'nigger' to mean a black man who freely enjoys his own laziness in any way he wants to; undisturbed by other people’s wishes for his behavior. Industrial desire originates in him and is directed by him. In that sense it is a word well worth retaining. As a poet, I find it has a rich, raunchy, elemental, down to earth sound, that connects us to something primal, indigent, and unencumbered by productivity."
http://www.femisex.com/content/alice-walker-reclaims-slut-and-nigger-valuable-women-and-blacks-calls-americans-terrorists

   Walker is a notorious lesbian who got wealthy depicting black men as animals in "Color Purple" which started a torrent of books and movies depicting all black men as dogs and savages. Her daughter just came out and wrote a piece on how Walker's radical feminist views almost destroyed her:


"You see, my mum taught me that children enslave women. I grew up believing that children are millstones around your neck, and the idea that motherhood can make you blissfully happy is a complete fairytale.
Family love? A young Rebecca with her parents
In fact, having a child has been the most rewarding experience of my life. Far from 'enslaving' me, three-and-a-half-year-old Tenzin has opened my world. My only regret is that I discovered the joys of motherhood so late - I have been trying for a second child for two years, but so far with no luck."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1021293/How-mothers-fanatical-feminist-views-tore-apart-daughter-The-Color-Purple-author.html



Wednesday, November 2, 2016

Women Against Rape's Survival Manual Teaches Women to Lie About, and Conceal Rape

In page 31 of Women Against Rape's Survival Manualthey basically train the rape accusers on how to lie about being asleep or unconscious at the time of the sexual contact even if they aren't sure they were raped, in order to sound convincing:



They also teach women to conceal an alleged rape from the police even though they might have medical evidence on page 8:


They tell women they also don't have to "be pushed" by the police to file a rape case, basically letting a supposed predator roam around free:





Feminists Claim Male Achievements and Misogyny are due to "Womb Envy".

In another episode of sheer psychological projection, feminists at the Women's Studies International Forum are now claiming the reason why men have achieved so much and helped to better the lives of everyone over the millennia, is due to the "fact" that we all are secretly jealous of women and their "goddess" like wombs:




And finally on pg 158 we get to the meat of the matter. They are basically claiming that "womb envy/jealousy" in men is the cause of all misogyny on the planet. Their source for this claim is Karen Horney who is credited with "founding" Feminist Psychology and is a series of outdated, untested theories from the 1920s:


Wednesday, August 24, 2016

Men Show More Emotional Control than Women.

Studies had to be carried out in order to confirm something that we'd be called "sexist" for even pointing out; that men tend to have more control over their emotions and act less hysterical than women, and also have the ability to help others regulate their own emotions.


 Source: Sex-Related Neuroanatomical Basis of Emotion Regulation Ability

Thursday, July 28, 2016

Canadian Women Benefit from Social Assistance More than Men.


   Canadian women rank higher in beneficiaries from tax payers' social assistance like "Employment and Income Assistance", but despite all that, you'll hear feminists complaining how Canadian society benefits males the most:





Sunday, July 17, 2016

The United Nations Admits Most Men in Third World Countries Oppose Female Genital Mutilation

The UN has now admitted that contrary to belief that FGM is associated with gender discrimination, most men and boys in third world countries oppose the practice. More men than women even oppose it in several of the countries where it is practiced the most. This admission will hopefully force the western media to resist blaming FGM on men-only in their reporting as they usually do in their articles. We won't hold our breath waiting on it though.



So far, to their credit, ABC News and the Washington Post have reported on the issue without altering the UN's statement.

Sunday, July 3, 2016

The Canadian Government is Lying About Women Being the Primary Victims of Violence

The Canadian Government is purposefully lying about how many women compared to men are victims of violence in the country. We discovered just how deep the lying go after cross-examining the statistics on gender violence on their Government website recently. In the screenshot we combined three set of statistics from the Canadian Government, the first one is from them lying and saying that women account for 51% of the victims of violence in the country, the second set of statistics is from the SAME website where they are telling you that women don't even account for half as many victims of violence as men do. The third set of statistics shows that the overall trend in violence against women has been a decrease in the numbers but the media and the Government are telling us it's an epidemic in their press releases.

Friday, June 10, 2016

The "Chivalry is Dead" Myth Debunked by New Study

Chivalry is dead, men operate on a bias against women, men care less about women than they do about other men.
We've heard all of this before and we are hearing it constantly as the "war on women" rhetoric reaches a fever-pitch but this new groundbreaking study shows that both men and women would sacrifice men in order to save women if they had to choose.
This is why there will never be military draft that includes women in most countries. Quote:
"We’re More Likely to Protect Women Than We Are Men
We’re more likely to sacrifice a man than a woman when it comes to both saving the lives of others and in pursuing our self-interests, a team of psychology researchers has found.
“Our study indicates that we think women’s welfare should be preserved over men’s,” observes Oriel FeldmanHall, a post-doctoral researcher at New York University and the study’s lead author....
In the trolley scenario, subjects read one of three versions of the dilemma, where each vignette described a man, woman, or gender-neutral bystander on the bridge.
The participants were then asked how willing they were to “push the [man/woman/person] onto the path of the oncoming trolley” in order to save five others farther down the track.
The results showed that both female and male subjects were much more likely to push the male bystander or one of unspecified gender than they were the female bystander."

Saturday, June 4, 2016

Girls Use Indirect Agression to Manipulate and Shame Competition.

    While it's that boys do tend to be more direct with their aggression, girls on the other end, learn through their verbal skills how to manipulate people, form groups in order to pressure or shame others.  Boys do tend to bully but girls are the ones who use the most peer pressure, and peer group in order to bully each other:

This was found in a study titled, "Do Girls Manipulate and Boys Fight?", where they have revealed that girls as young as 8, tend to use indirect means of aggression; such as passive-aggressiveness, manipulation and using groups to intimidate rivals. While not prevalent to girls of that age, the trend and frequency skyrocketed by ages 11 through 15 - which the study also revealed that adult women were the biggest users of indirect aggression:




  




And from another study title, "Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy?" women have been found to use the same types of passive aggressive strategies in order to exaggerate their own sexual value by shaming or defaming another women to other women, or the men they  target for sexual selection:


"Indirect aggression includes behaviours such as criticizing a competitor's appearance, spreading rumours about a person's sexual behaviour and social exclusion. Human females have a particular proclivity for using indirect aggression, which is typically directed at other females, especially attractive and sexually available females, in the context of intrasexual competition for mates. Indirect aggression is an effective intrasexual competition strategy. It is associated with a diminished willingness to compete on the part of victims and with greater dating and sexual behaviour among those who perpetrate the aggression."

Saturday, May 28, 2016

Female Hypergamy is an Adaptation Survival Strategy Rooted in Biological and Socio-economic Factors.


       Female hypergamy is a biological mechanism women developed for survival that is still very observable and and quantified nowadays in the 21st century despite our advances as a civilization. Many sex typical behaviors are rooted in our own inherent nature despite all the rationalization done by the feminists and neo progressives inside academia pulling their buzzwords like "patriarchy" and "social construct".

In this article, we will look at the science behind female sexual predilection and choices based purely on biological and psychological reasons. Women prefer more intelligent, creative and more masculine men who perform physical tasks, which produces stronger and more intelligent children:







Source: http://www.ehbonline.org/article/S1090-5138%2808%2900079-2/abstract?cc=y=






                              

Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130383/pdf/rstb20100404.pdf

       Women also prefer gifts and material wealth as signs of affection and romance, while men just see them as tools of courtship to gain sexual favors, as we can read in a study titled, " 'Heck with the flowers and candy—I just want sex!' Women’s and men’s agreement and disagreement about romance":

"As a concise definition of romance is virtually absent in the literature, based on our analysis of scientific and layperson construal of romance, we define it as an orientation toward a partner whereby 1 expresses love, caring, and sexuality to facilitate and solidify commitment. Of interest to the authors, men’s and women’s definitions of romance were similar, and they placed equal importance on romance in a committed relationship. However, men considered themselves to be less romantic than did women, and men considered romance to a means to sexual access more than did women. This evidence suggests that men, acknowledging its importance, may be just “playing the game” of romance to gain sexual access. These results can be interpreted through an evolutionary psychological framework vis-à-vis the fundamental reproductive differences between the sexes."
Women also associate sexual stimulation with material wealth, while seeing lower value objects as negative sexual stimuli, to the point of even upsetting them: all the while men placed no sexual value on wealth:


                         

 

Source: The Price Had Better Be Right: Women’s Reactions to Sexual Stimuli Vary With Market Factors

In another study, researchers examined the mate preferences in dating site that had a highly skewed sex ratio (646 men for 1,000 women). But despite all that, they still found that women remain highly selective of higher status men even during the study's "marriage squeeze" scenario:





Sunday, May 15, 2016

The Myth That Most Women Didn't Vote Because Their Husbands Didn't Allow Them To

The popular myth concerning the accepted history of women's voting rights is that women were ultra enthusiastic overall about voting but the men in their families were oppressing them and preventing them from voting.
The Pew Research Center however, detailed a survey of women from 1923 where 65% of the women chose not to vote and found that less than 3% of the women said that they didn't vote because their husbands didn't want them to.
A much higher percentage of them said they did not believe in voting than those who said that they didn't vote because their husbands didn't want them to (11% vs 3%).
46% of the women chose to vote for President versus 75% of the men.

This is vital information because it gives us a glimpse of what the mindset of women were like in large cities back then concerning suffrage as opposed to the myths.

The Myth that Women Were Not Allowed to Hold Office or Court Prior to The Feminist Movement

If women were 100% not allowed to hold office at all prior to the feminist movement by the evil patriarchy as feminists claim, then how were women allowed to be Queens? Why is an entire era called The Victorian Era?


 A declaration from a case in 1808 stated that women were allowed to hold most offices in the UK including Queen of course, and this was long before the feminist movement.





And yet here feminists are claiming that women wouldn't have that right without them.

Granted, life for both women and men was often no picnic back then, and there was plenty of discrimination against both sexes, but the fact remains, you are being lied to about women not being allowed to be public officials or hold court.

The first female mayor in the United States was Susanna M. Salter in 1887 which was at least 70 years before anything called the feminist movement existed. There is no record of her having to fight to be mayor.



Friday, May 13, 2016

Women in Colonial America were the first to Own Printing Presses.

  Unlike the humongous myths you have heard or been told by feminists, when it comes to women having basic rights as men did; like having the right to education and running businesses, during the colonial days of the US, women were pioneering in journalism and advertisements.

In"Encyclopedia of Women in American History", we discover that the first person to even own a printing press was a woman named Elizabeth Glover of Cambridge MA, in 1638, and 25 women who ran newspapers and presses, plus other additional 26 cases; including where a woman opened up her own firm with her own money. Do these women sound oppressed to you?  



When we read further down, we also find out that a woman named Mary Katherine Goddard was chosen to be the first one to even print out the first copy of the Declaration of Independence, and that publications respected both male and female audiences; even not wanting to offend women who would read those articles. Sounds like typical chauvinism in action to me:


                                              

These just helps demonstrate some of the massive lies your government, teachers and the mainstream media have told you regarding women's level of freedom in early America
.

Monday, May 2, 2016

Women of all Classes could Vote in England before Women's Suffrage

   Another important piece of information that we are being lied about and letting the feminist movement get away with, is the historical revisionism they commit when they claim women were just properties of men and could not vote before women's suffrage. We posted in this blog how that was a lie in the U.S, and now that is also a lie in England.


Women of all classes and social status voted 75 years prior to the Parliamentary franchise to officially give women the vote. Those include women who were property owners and owned businesses as well, but we were told women weren't allowed to do that?

Here's The Telegraph's report on it:
"A new document has surfaced which shows British women, of all classes, voting in 1843, some 75 years before they received the parliamentary franchise in 1918. History professor, Sarah Richardson, explains what this discovery means and how it was possible.

The document in question was a poll book for the election to the local office of Assistant Overseer of the Poor, in the parish of St Chad’s, Lichfield in 1843. I was tipped off about its existence by a friend, Philip Salmon of the History of Parliament. It was a schedule of voters, their addresses, the rates they paid and how they voted. But as I looked down the list of names, some immediately jumped off the page: Elizabeth Shorthouse, Hannah Holiman, Phoebe Skelton, Ann Mallett… In all, there were thirty women playing an active role in the election.

Although I knew that in theory women retained the right to vote for some local officials in the nineteenth century, I had never seen any evidence of them doing so in practice. This lack of evidence had led me, and many other historians, to assume that voting was entirely a male prerogative before the twentieth century.

The record was compiled because the solicitors were the agents for the Conservative party in Lichfield. The town was a highly marginal constituency in this period, so the party clearly wanted to keep tabs on the political temperature between parliamentary elections. The solicitor would have compiled the poll book from the ballot papers returned by the voters.

In the period before the secret ballot, everyone was entitled to know how people voted. It was unusual to have an election for an Assistant Overseer. This was a powerful post responsible for collecting poor rates and deciding how they were allocated. But the overseers were usually appointed to avoid the expense of an election. All heads of households, paying rates were entitled to vote. This was a very wide franchise, and one that included single and widowed women.
 
My assumption was that the women would be of genteel status. But as I checked their names against the 1841 census return, I was surprised to see the diversity of the group of voters. There were a few women of independent means, owning property and land. There were also women, probably widows, who had inherited their husbands’ businesses. So, for example, the wealthiest female elector on the roll was Grace Brown, a butcher, who managed a large household including several servants.

Due to the high rates that she paid, Grace was entitled to four votes in the election, which she cast in favour of the Conservative candidate. But I was amazed to see many women on the list who were far lower down the social scale including the laundress, Caroline Edge, the servant, Sarah Payne and even paupers, including Sarah Batkin of Stowe Street.

The poll book is all that remains of an unremarkable local parish election in a comfortable Midlands market town in the mid nineteenth century. Yet, it has prompted a need to re-write the history books by providing the first substantial proof that women were able to vote long before they received the parliamentary or municipal franchise"





Saturday, April 30, 2016

National Organization for Women's Direct ties to Marxism and their Anti-Family Agenda.

   This particular article was written by pioneering feminist man-hater Mallory Millet and in it she comes clean about how her sister Kate Millet stated that her and the largest feminist group, The National Organization for Women were hell-bent on destroying the family. Quote from Front Page Magazine :

"It was 1969. Kate invited me to join her for a gathering at the home of her friend, Lila Karp. They called the assemblage a "consciousness-raising-group," a typical communist exercise, something practiced in Maoist China.

We gathered at a large table as the chairperson opened the meeting with a back-and-forth recitation, like a Litany, a type of prayer done in Catholic Church. But now it was Marxism, the Church of the Left, mimicking religious practice:
They proceeded with a long discussion on how to advance these goals by establishing The National Organization of Women...

“And how do we make Cultural Revolution?" she demanded.
"By destroying the American family!" they answered.
"How do we destroy the family?" she came back.
"By destroying the American Patriarch," they cried exuberantly...

Katie said, "Come to New York. We're making revolution! Some of us are starting the National Organization of Women and you can be part of it...

The only way to do this was "to invade every American institution. Every one must be permeated with ‘The Revolution’": The media, the educational system, universities, high schools, K-12, school boards, etc.; then, the judiciary, the legislatures, the executive branches and even the library system."


If anyone needed more proof of the ties of Marxism and feminism, here it is folks! And they had some common goals. Wonder why your political, educational, media, entertainment, academic, military establishments are all basically sold out no more! We have solid proof of a conspiracy.

Friday, April 29, 2016

American Women's Femininity has Dramatically Decreased Since the 70's

  Feminist psychologists proudly bragged about the fact that American women's femininity has decreased since the beginning of the height of the feminist movement's power during the 70's.

They carried out a study where they measured male and female typical gender attitudes and levels of androgyny, and found that men have pretty much remained in the same roles while women have become more androgynous and masculine.

The study already starts by feminists patting each other on the back and describing their findings:




 

Despite admitting that women in the U.S have become less and less feminine, these feminists are still contradicting themselves by saying that just because women are becoming more masculine, that doesn't mean they are abandoning femininity but
are "re-defining" what it means to be feminine by using a term called "bodily property" that is based on "willpower, discipline and social standing", which ironically are traditional male attitudes



Source: Masculine and Feminine Traits on the Bem Sex-Role Inventory, 1993–2012: a Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis

Yet when we look at more objective and empirical evidences based on hard science, traditional femininity is rooted in evolutionary sexual selection and parenting styles that creates an optimal environment for the propagation of the human race:
 "Psychological evidence suggests that sex differences in morphology have been modified by sexual selection so as to attract mates (intersexual selection) or intimidate rivals (intrasexual selection).

Women compete with each other for high quality husbands by advertising reproductive value in terms of the distribution of fat reserves and by exaggerating morphological indicators of youthfulness such as a small nose and small feet and pale, hairless skin.

Men's physical appearance tends to communicate social dominance, which has the combined effects of intimidating reproductive rivals and attracting mates. In addition to their attractiveness and intimidatory effects, human secondary sexual characters also provide cues to hormonal status and phenotypic quality consistent with the good genes model of sexual selection (which includes parasite resistance).

Low waist-hip ratio is sexually attractive in women and indicates a high estrogen/testosterone ratio (which favors reproductive function). Facial attractiveness provides honest cues to health and mate value. The permanently enlarged female breast appears to have evolved under the influence of both the good genes and the runaway selection mechanisms."
 Source: The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology


Source: The functional neuroanatomy of maternal love: mother's response to infant's attachment behaviors

Thursday, April 28, 2016

Women Prison Workers are Majory of those who Lust after Criminals


    A new study by the University of Montreal reveals the fact that female prison workers who should know better than to get involved with criminals, are the majority of the ones who lust after inmates, while male workers are in the minority.

Not only female prison guards were the ones getting involved with criminals but clinicians, including criminologists, psychologists, and nurses; and women comprise 70% of those romantically involved with criminals compared to 30% of men.

Quote from the Daily Mail:


"The official term for lusting after people with a criminal record is known as hybristophilia and has been studied by Dr Philippe Bensimon at the University of Montreal.

In a study published in the journal Déliquance, justice et autres questions de société, the researcher focused on more than 300 cases of the phenomenon in the US and European media over a ten-year period, from 2005 to 2015.

For all of the instances, the prison workers were dismissed from their roles and some even from their professions entirely.

The study found women were more affected than men, with over 70 per cent of cases of sexual misconduct in US correctional system involving female staff, despite them making up less than half of the prison workforce.

According to Dr Bensimon, this skewed proportion may be due to the roles in which women typically work, which could lead to emotional bonds forming between staff and inmates.

'This is possibly explained by the fact that women occupy mainly professional positions,' he said.

'For example, in Canada, many correctional facilities for men are mostly made up of women clinicians, including criminologists, psychologists, and nurses.' "

Tuesday, April 26, 2016

International Data Suggests Women are half to Blame for Partner Violence


   A study carried out by Murray A. Straus from the University of New Hampshire titled "Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations" revealed that women were responsible for half of the perpetrated partner violence in The group studied.

 The study further questions the lie that it is mostly men being violent and domineering in relationships, and female dominance is more closely correlated to partner violence than male; also that abuse programs need to end their female biased services whereas men are vastly ignored or treated as the abusers themselves:



  

 It is further revealed that female-only violence is more frequent than male-only; and that the types of injuries committed by both genders are almost the same, unlike most feminists claim:






     The author was bold enough to reveal how even in the so-called patriarchal nations, these results are to be found. Another pretty eye opening admission from this study is that the author heavily criticized the government for refusing to fund programs for male victims and how the feminist movement holds a monopoly on gendered programs and is to blame for the bias that ignores half of the perpetrators based on the "Duluth" model of domestic violence:









     More important details can be found in the part where the study shows that female dominance is more correlated to partner violence than male dominance, and that male chivalry may be responsible for males not retaliating as much:




     One last detail that puts to rest another famous feminist lie, is that this study also reveals that severe injuries are almost as likely to be female-perpetrated in cases of more serious violence; 85% male compared to 74% female, female-only severe assaults being higher than male-only: