Mainstream Media's Dishonest Collusion Against University of Minnesota's Football Players.

      Ten football players from the University of Minnesota's Gophers were suspended in September over a sexual assault accusation by a female student and her mother. Despite finding no evidence that there was actually assault in the report, (quite the contrary as we will further demonstrate) the University and the media still put these students on blast claiming that she was more "believable" over a redacted (censored) report that they kept private and didn't want to disclose.  The original report is over 80 pages, but after they redacted it, it was released as a 20 pages version of the same report. What were they hiding?


Here are a few media sources basically copying and pasting from each other trying to paint these students as guilt and nowhere do they mention the fact that this girl basically lied, which we will share in this blog article, so the reader can verify that this is yet another case of regret group sex by the female.


Here is a report by USNews:

"The school suspended the 10 players after completing its own investigation, the results of which it kept private, citing federal privacy laws. But a local TV station published a redacted copy of the 82-page report which quoted the woman as saying she believed 10 to 20 men had sex with her, though she was not certain. She told university investigators she was too traumatized to clearly remember events.
The report concluded that the victim's account of that night was more credible than the players it interviewed, and said some players tried to impede the university's investigation into the incident."

Here's one by The Chicago Tribune's report, which is identical to the previous one, and here is the ESPN report, yet another identical one.
None of these mainstream media reports provide a link to the court documents(although I was able to obtain them doing some extensive searching from a local news station).

The media also conveniently leaves out the fact that the accuser's mother was the one who initially claimed her daughter was raped and then the so-called victim seems to have been pressured to report it to the police by her mom.

Here are the damning screenshots from the actual report where we can see that the media and University are lying intentionally:

After opening up the court documents in the University of Minnesota sexual assault case, the first red flag is that the woman who claims she was sexually assaulted did not want to file a report and her mother was the one who called the police to try to file the report.

So it could be a case of where her mother found out she was having consensual group sex with these football players and she got embarrassed and claimed she was raped.

She admits they were flirting with her, she explains in detail about how she still decided to go back to one of the guy's apartment knowing he was interested in her. Now how can she remember all of this stuff if she claims she was too intoxicated to consent to sex? Also why can't she "remember" how many of the guys she slept with?

So she gets onto the guy's bed and magically she loses her memory and doesn't remember how her clothes got off, but she does remember giving him/them blowjobs but doesn't explain how any of them supposedly forced her to give them blowjobs. She admits she was trying to get him/them to ejaculate.

Here's that magical selective memory at work again. She says she might have been held down by the guys but doesn't remember whether it was real or just her fear that invented the memory.

SHE THEN AGREED TO GO BACK TO THE ROOM WITH THE GUY WHO SHE CLAIMS RAPED HER AGAIN AND HE ASKED HER IF SHE WAS COOL WITH THE GROUP SEX. If she's in "fear" of these guys then why would she go back to one of their rooms?

Here we go. She admits on pg 13 that she sat on the couch in between the guys and started "flirting" with them. Notice how they don't go into detail about what she said specifically while flirting with them? Sneaky sneaky.

She has now changed her mind and said that the sex with some of the boys "might" have been consensual but with the others it wasn't. Boy oh boy you gotta love this chick's selective memory.

Still on page 13 here and LOOK at how the police are white knighting for this chick and basically giving her the go ahead to change her story. 

Ok pay close attention to this part of the documents. In this part they describe what happened in the video footage of the incident captured by one of the football players. The police say she doesn't appear to be too intoxicated to not know what's going on, she doesn't appear to be objecting to any of the sex and the entire video is sexually playful on both ends. This important piece of the story was also left out of the media reports! 

The police then go on to describe the part of the video where she is giving one of the players a blowjob while the other player is penetrating her from behind and they say it appears to be consensual once again. She isn't slurring her words or objecting to anything in the video and is fully conscious of what is going on.

Ok the football player that she admits she probably had consensual sex with said that when she first started flirting with them she brought up the idea of having a threesome with three guys and so they offered to take her up to their apartment which she then consented to.

This is what the accuser meant when she said she "flirted" with them but strangely the police didn't seem to want to make her go into detail about what she said when she flirted with them. 

The football player by the name of Carlton showed the cops his video footage of the incident and the cops agreed that it did appear that she was conscious and a willing participant in the sex during the entire video.

 Even after reviewing the redacted information itself, we can read as to why the mainstream media concealed all the major facts we now know about this case and how this young woman lied about these young men, and still the media and the report itself, keep referring to her "victim".  

It makes one wonder what the entire 82 pages report actually reveals when the 20 pages that were censored pretty tells us she consented to everything that happened

 

Even after reviewing the redacted information itself, we can read as to why the mainstream media concealed all the major facts we now know about this case and how this young woman lied about these young men, and still the media and the report itself, keep referring to her "victim".

It makes one wonder what the entire 82 pages report actually reveals when the 20 pages that were censored pretty tells us she consented to everything that happened