Virginia's Men's Rights Groups Supporters in Virginia Were 25% Women.

During the 70's, men's rights groups in Virginia were supported by women who comprised 25% of these organizations whom themselves were mothers, wives and grandmothers, who were helping men fight bigoted judges and the justice system who just painted them as "radicals" and even went as far as to lie to say that any advance on men's causes, were done so by feminists":

"Donald A. Hillstrom, an 'approved' Minneapolis attorney who specializes in representing men in who seek custody, credits men's groups not only with instilling members with a positive attitude that has helped them win, but also changing the attitudes of the courts. 

' At first', says Hillstrom, 'the Minnesota courts considered them radical organizations and ignored them. Then they realized the men's groups were there to stay, and subtle changes began to occur. Judicial treatment of men became more fair, and more men began to win custody over their children.' 

Chief Judge Susanne C Sedwick of the Hennepin County (Minnesota) Family Court, sees it a little differently however. 

'The courts really haven't been influenced by the existence of men's rights groups;, says Judge Sedwick. Instead, she attributes the decline of ' the stereotyping courts have been guilty of" to a general raising of the public consciousness begun by the Women's Rights Movement.' 

'Most of the men's rights activists do not consider themselves anti-feminists, but rather- as Virginia's Diamond puts it- 'Pro-family'. 'Texas' Shelton says that 25% of his members are women, whose ex-daughters- and sons-in-law, who have prevented them from seeing their grandchildren after divorce. 

In Virginia, Diamond's group is forming a 'Second Wives Coalition' whose members have all married divorced men and whose paychecks, because of what they claim are inequities in alimony and support statutes, go to help support their husbands' ex-wives."

https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=dx5cAAAAIBAJ&sjid=N1UNAAAAIBAJ&pg=2516,1591029&dq=men%27s+rights+1970+25+women&hl=en


That judge was a founding member National Association of Women Judges which is another sexist female supremist organization pretty much. Check out their mission statement and website:

"NAWJ is the nation’s leading voice for women jurists dedicated to preserving judicial independence, ensuring equal justice and access to the courts for women, minorities and other historically disfavored groups, providing judicial education on cutting-edge issues, and increasing the numbers and advancement of women judges at all levels to more accurately reflect their full participation in a democratic society."
https://www.nawj.org/

Dads Are More Attentive And Responsive Towards Toddler Daughters Than Sons

Another study has confirmed the obvious; that fathers tend to be more attentive towards their daughter's emotional and physical needs than their sons. And here we thought that dads worshiped their male offspring while they were bigoted against their daughters according to the feminist orthodoxy. This has been published on the Behavioral Neuroscience:

"Multiple lines of research indicate that fathers often treat boys and girls differently in ways that impact child outcomes. The complex picture that has emerged, however, is obscured by methodological challenges inherent to the study of parental caregiving, and no studies to date have examined the possibility that gender differences in observed real-world paternal behavior are related to differential paternal brain responses to male and female children. Here we compare fathers of daughters and fathers of sons in terms of naturalistically observed everyday caregiving behavior and neural responses to child picture stimuli. 

Compared with fathers of sons, fathers of daughters were more attentively engaged with their daughters, sang more to their daughters, used more analytical language and language related to sadness and the body with their daughters, and had a stronger neural response to their daughter’s happy facial expressions in areas of the brain important for reward and emotion regulation (medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex [OFC]). In contrast, fathers of sons engaged in more rough and tumble play (RTP), used more achievement language with their sons, and had a stronger neural response to their son’s neutral facial expressions in the medial OFC (mOFC). Whereas the mOFC response to happy faces was negatively related to RTP, the mOFC response to neutral faces was positively related to RTP, specifically for fathers of boys. These results indicate that real-world paternal behavior and brain function differ as a function of child gender."

Women Slut Shame Women More than Men.

 

Women are more likely to slut shame other women rather than men. This is one of those facts they quietly reported:

"Sexual permissiveness can be defined as attitudes or behaviors that are more liberal or extensive than what is normative in a social group. It can include actual or desiredfrequent, premarital, casual, group, or extradyadic sex, sex with many partners, early sexual debut, or even nonverbal cues signalizing availability (e.g., provocative clothing). 

Women and nonpermissive (sexually) men also rated the permissive target lower on friendship, desirability. Whereas women preferred the nonpermissive target in all four dimensions, men showed preference for the permissive target in the first two, and no preference in the last two dimensions. 

Thus, a man who has managed to attract many partners is particularly successful and assumed to be confident and emotionally secure.The acquisition of many sexual partners by a woman, on the other hand, is not a difficult achievement and is therefore interpreted as resulting from low self-esteem."

Birds of a feather? Not when it comes to sexual permissiveness

Women Proposed a Bachelor Tax and Forced Military Service Act in 1707

Since during in 1707, women were demanding bachelors to be taxed in order to force men to marry women and become unwilling white knights and providers. This is how women were oppressed during the height of the Western patriarchy. 

This is more exposure on the hidden history and the lies your teachers told you. The following quotes come from the book " Female Grievances: Dialogues between two Young Ladies concerning Love and Marriage":

"Eliza: Amongst all the female grievances we have hitherto debated there still remains one we have not yet touch’d upon. There are an abundance of bachelors who, thro’ a cowardly apprehension of the cares and troubles of the marry’d state, are so fearful of entering into it, that they would rather run the hazard of damning their souls with the repeated sin of fornication, than they will honestly engage in Wedlock to procreate within those reasonable bounds which the united laws of both God and man have both religiously appointed: Therefore methinks it would well become the care of a Parliament to redress this grievance, so very hurtful to the Kingdom in general, as well as to our sex in particular, by some compulsory law that should enforce Marriage upon all single sinners who otherwise will never keep a cow of their own whilst a quart of milk is to be brought for a penny.'

 Mariana: 'I’ll assure you i like your thoughts very well, for if we consider rightly, we can allow bachelors to be no other than drones in the great-hive of the Common-wealth, that enjoy without reason, the advantage of marry’d peoples labours, in having their liberties and estates secur’d by the loss of other men’s lives, and will not be industrious to repair from their own loins the native strength of the Kingdom, for tho’ they have not continence enough to forebear the pleasure, yet the liberty they take is with such common strumpets, who by their debaucheries and distempers, are render’d wholly incapable of producing any serviceable fruits of their sinful labours. Therefore pray let us lay our heads together and consult of some proposals that might move our Senate to a wise consideration of this weighty matter.'

Eliza: 'Pray, cousin, do you begin and propose one clause and I another, and so we’ll proceed till we have digested our project into so many several heads, that may be an ease to the Senate if ever we should hereafter petition the House to bring in a Bill for the Advancement of the Church and the suppression of Vice, and the improvement of the native strength of Her Majesties Kingdom in a lawful way.
Mariana: With all my heart; you would have me begin, so accordingly I’ll proceed to the business, vis:
'That every bachelor above the age of twenty, and childless widower under the age of fifty, shall be obliged to marry within the circle of one year, commencing from the date of the Act, or else be liable to be press’d into the Sea or Land Service (after the expiration of the Term limited) when ever Her Majesties Forces shall need a further recruit.'

Eliza: That their personal effects shall be all sequester’d by the government, and be distributed by an Almoner for that purpose, into the hands of so many trustees, chosen out of every Parish, for the better supporting and maintaining all such poor children as have lost their fathers in defence of the Kingdom, and the overplus to be disposed of amongst those miserable husbands who are plagued with scolding wives and smoky houses. 

Mariana: 'That an alms house shall be built and endow’d for the reception of all such childless widowers and bachelors as shall, by reason of their low stature, crookedness, weakness, or any other infirmities whatsoever, be judg’d unfit for His Majesty’s Service; and that every such widower or bachelor shall be allowed one warm frize gown every year with a yellow badge upon the right arm, upon which shall be stamped an Ape in a string, and under shall be engraven this motto': 

'Who dies an old maid

leads apes when she’s dead;

But he that hates wiving

shall lead ’em whilst living.'

'That every single member shall have a convenient apartment to himself, with a bed, two pair of coarse sheets, one leathern chair, one earthen candlestick, a green chamber-pot, and a little grate, and every ten of them shall have an old woman to wait upon ’em, and to hand ’em their water-gruel, barley-broth, turnips, carrots and potatoes; for that they shall not be allow’d any other food than soop, herbs and roots, because they have forfeited the Liberty of an Englishman, by not loving the flesh in a righteous way, therefore they ought not to indulge their vicious appetites.'

Eliza: 'O sye, Madam, should we put such a cruel article upon the poor gentlemen it would be constru’d as downright tyranny, beyond all president.'

Mariana: 'I am sorry to see you so tender of those who are so cruel to us, whoever refuses out of obstinacy to comply with the Term has resolved himself into a state of insufficiency, choosing rather to suffer than to marry; therefore we ought to consider them as much superanuated as to our sex, as if he were fourscore, but no infirmity ought to be allowed a good reason against a man’s marrying; for tho’ he is unable to get children, he is nevertheless able to father ’em; therefore, I think, all those that stand out in contempt of wedlock, cannot be dealt with too severely.'

Eliza: 'Truly, cousin, upon second thoughts I must agree with you that they cannot be use’d to hardly. But, I doubt the Parliament will expect we’ll be setting forth the danger of celibacy to a nation as the chief motive to induce ’em to take our other proposals into their wise consideration.'

Mariana: That’s well thought on; but we must be very brief, for the Members of Parliament hate long things, tho’ we women are said to love ’em; therefore let us begin and help one another to concisely set forth the dangers of celibacy.' "

The Claim That Rape Is The Most Underreported Crime Is A Myth

I've been examining this often-repeated claim that rape is the most underreported crime and so I stumbled upon the actual US Bureau of Justice Statistics actual numbers on the rate of unreported crimes.

The screenshot below, from their statistics, clearly shows that several crimes are more likely to go underreported than rape, and in fact, some of the numbers vastly outnumber the numbers for rape.
Those numbers are taken from pg 7 of their publication "Criminal Victimization, 2015"

Do a quick google search for the phrase "rape is the most underreported crime" and you'll get 10 pages-worth of people lying and saying that it's the most underreported crime. Also as of this writing, I was unable to find anyone debunking this myth. 

Men "Need to Adapt" to Alarming Rates of Job Scarcity in Male Oriented Fields According to "Experts"

Male oriented fields in the job market have been on steady decline while female has been on the rise; some of the reasons being education is not veered towards helping boys succeed, but the solution according to the mangina "expert"? Men need to suck it up and adapt, and despite many fields being female dominated, they are still suffer wage discrimination. Sounds plausible to me:

"Opportunities in female-dominated industries have continued to expand, Swartz says, but men have not been gravitating toward those jobs. 

Nearly 200,000 jobs were created in the health care and social service industries over the past four years in Canada. Yet in 2016, only 10 per cent of registered nurses and 12 per cent of health care aides were men. 

'It's sociocultural,' Swartz said. "There is still an attitude that we leave those jobs for women — men don't do those kinds of jobs.' 

There has been little to no effort to attract men to these positions or recruit them into training programs, but perhaps an even bigger barrier is the wage gap.
'In a lot of these female occupations, they are not really paid well,' Swartz said. 'If you lost a high-paying job, you don't want to move too far down the ladder. We still have wage discrimination in the labour market.' 

Swartz says boys and men need to start thinking about alternative career options or "'his will continue to be a problem for an entire gender.The problem, he says, starts in school. 

And it's not confined to Canada. An OECD report in 2012 showed that 15-year-old boys were underachieving in basic proficiency in math, reading or science in every OECD country."

http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/business/men-boys-falling-behind-1.3962316

The Courts' Stated Policy Were Agaisnt Invasion of Privacy in Domestic Disputes, No Matter Who Was to Blame.

Despite what the feminist movement is telling us and despite what most people believe the courts did not condone violence against women, in fact they regularly intervened when a husband severely abused his wife.

But their stated policy was that they refused to intervene in the privacy of the home for minor physical altercations between husbands and wives REGARDLESS of who the perpetrator was. This is the verdict from a Supreme Court Decision in 1870 from North Carolina. I know this is long-winded but please take the time to read it:

"It will be observed that the ground upon which we have put this decision is not that the husband has the right to whip his wife much or little; but that we will not interfere with family government in trifling cases. We will no more interfere where the husband whips the wife than where the wife whips the husband; and yet we would hardly be supposed to hold that a wife has a right to whip her husband.

We will not inflict upon society the greater evil of raising the curtain upon domestic privacy, to punish the lesser evil of trifling violence. Two boys under fourteen years of age fight upon the playground, and yet the courts will take no notice of it, not for the reason that boys have the right to fight, but because the interests of society require that they should be left to the more appropriate discipline of the school room and of home. It [**10] is not true that boys have a right to fight; nor is it true that a husband has a right to whip his wife."

http://faculty.uml.edu/sgallagher/StatevRhodes.htm

Mothers Enjoy Expensive Gifts, Trips While Fathers get Collect Calls on Their Respective Holidays

In the so-called patriarchal society we supposedly live in, mothers get luxurious gifts, phone calls and taken on trips on Mother's Day, while dear old dads get collect calls on their own dime and the children just sit on the couch to watch the game with them on Father's Day:

" 'Dad tends to be more low-maintenance than mom,' says Tracy Mullin, president and CEO of the National Retail Federation, a Washington (D.C.) trade association for retailers. 'While moms love to receive luxury items such as jewelry or a trip to the spa, dads are happy with an afternoon barbecue or watching the ball game without distraction.

It gets better. Children often call dad to send their love but do so on his dime: Father's Day traditionally marks the year's busiest collect-call day for AT&T. And those who remember to send greeting cards do so in significantly smaller numbers. Hallmark sold 152 million Mother's Day cards this year but expects to unload only 95 million for Father's Day. According to BIGresearch, women -- who make the most purchases for either dads or husbands -- tend to head to discount stores to find that perfect gift for dad. Ouch!"

Sources: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2005-06-13/fathers-unspectacular-day
http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2006/05/09/calling-mom-on-mothers-day-and-the-day-before-and-the-day-after/ 

Revealing Study Suggests Circumcision Causes Urethral Stricture Diseases.

The hazards of male genital mutilation is further revealed in a study from Department of Epidemiology Research in Denmark leaves boys and men at higher risks for urethral stricture diseases, urinary tract infections and even damage to bladder or kidney function:

Here are some of the symptom and possible complications from USD:

"Symptoms include:

Abnormal strength and direction of urine stream
Bed wetting
Bleeding (hematuria) at end of urination
Discomfort with urination or straining with urination
Incontinence (day or night)
Visible narrow opening in boys

Possible Complications

Complications may include:

Abnormal urine stream
Blood in the urine
Frequent urination
Painful urination
Urinary incontinence
Urinary tract infections
Damage to bladder or kidney function in severe cases"

https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/001599.htm

Mainstream Media's Dishonest Collusion Against University of Minnesota's Football Players.

      Ten football players from the University of Minnesota's Gophers were suspended in September over a sexual assault accusation by a female student and her mother. Despite finding no evidence that there was actually assault in the report, (quite the contrary as we will further demonstrate) the University and the media still put these students on blast claiming that she was more "believable" over a redacted (censored) report that they kept private and didn't want to disclose.  The original report is over 80 pages, but after they redacted it, it was released as a 20 pages version of the same report. What were they hiding?


Here are a few media sources basically copying and pasting from each other trying to paint these students as guilt and nowhere do they mention the fact that this girl basically lied, which we will share in this blog article, so the reader can verify that this is yet another case of regret group sex by the female.


Here is a report by USNews:

"The school suspended the 10 players after completing its own investigation, the results of which it kept private, citing federal privacy laws. But a local TV station published a redacted copy of the 82-page report which quoted the woman as saying she believed 10 to 20 men had sex with her, though she was not certain. She told university investigators she was too traumatized to clearly remember events.
The report concluded that the victim's account of that night was more credible than the players it interviewed, and said some players tried to impede the university's investigation into the incident."

Here's one by The Chicago Tribune's report, which is identical to the previous one, and here is the ESPN report, yet another identical one.
None of these mainstream media reports provide a link to the court documents(although I was able to obtain them doing some extensive searching from a local news station).

The media also conveniently leaves out the fact that the accuser's mother was the one who initially claimed her daughter was raped and then the so-called victim seems to have been pressured to report it to the police by her mom.

Here are the damning screenshots from the actual report where we can see that the media and University are lying intentionally:

After opening up the court documents in the University of Minnesota sexual assault case, the first red flag is that the woman who claims she was sexually assaulted did not want to file a report and her mother was the one who called the police to try to file the report.

So it could be a case of where her mother found out she was having consensual group sex with these football players and she got embarrassed and claimed she was raped.

She admits they were flirting with her, she explains in detail about how she still decided to go back to one of the guy's apartment knowing he was interested in her. Now how can she remember all of this stuff if she claims she was too intoxicated to consent to sex? Also why can't she "remember" how many of the guys she slept with?

So she gets onto the guy's bed and magically she loses her memory and doesn't remember how her clothes got off, but she does remember giving him/them blowjobs but doesn't explain how any of them supposedly forced her to give them blowjobs. She admits she was trying to get him/them to ejaculate.

Here's that magical selective memory at work again. She says she might have been held down by the guys but doesn't remember whether it was real or just her fear that invented the memory.

SHE THEN AGREED TO GO BACK TO THE ROOM WITH THE GUY WHO SHE CLAIMS RAPED HER AGAIN AND HE ASKED HER IF SHE WAS COOL WITH THE GROUP SEX. If she's in "fear" of these guys then why would she go back to one of their rooms?

Here we go. She admits on pg 13 that she sat on the couch in between the guys and started "flirting" with them. Notice how they don't go into detail about what she said specifically while flirting with them? Sneaky sneaky.

She has now changed her mind and said that the sex with some of the boys "might" have been consensual but with the others it wasn't. Boy oh boy you gotta love this chick's selective memory.

Still on page 13 here and LOOK at how the police are white knighting for this chick and basically giving her the go ahead to change her story. 

Ok pay close attention to this part of the documents. In this part they describe what happened in the video footage of the incident captured by one of the football players. The police say she doesn't appear to be too intoxicated to not know what's going on, she doesn't appear to be objecting to any of the sex and the entire video is sexually playful on both ends. This important piece of the story was also left out of the media reports! 

The police then go on to describe the part of the video where she is giving one of the players a blowjob while the other player is penetrating her from behind and they say it appears to be consensual once again. She isn't slurring her words or objecting to anything in the video and is fully conscious of what is going on.

Ok the football player that she admits she probably had consensual sex with said that when she first started flirting with them she brought up the idea of having a threesome with three guys and so they offered to take her up to their apartment which she then consented to.

This is what the accuser meant when she said she "flirted" with them but strangely the police didn't seem to want to make her go into detail about what she said when she flirted with them. 

The football player by the name of Carlton showed the cops his video footage of the incident and the cops agreed that it did appear that she was conscious and a willing participant in the sex during the entire video.

 Even after reviewing the redacted information itself, we can read as to why the mainstream media concealed all the major facts we now know about this case and how this young woman lied about these young men, and still the media and the report itself, keep referring to her "victim".  

It makes one wonder what the entire 82 pages report actually reveals when the 20 pages that were censored pretty tells us she consented to everything that happened

 

Even after reviewing the redacted information itself, we can read as to why the mainstream media concealed all the major facts we now know about this case and how this young woman lied about these young men, and still the media and the report itself, keep referring to her "victim".

It makes one wonder what the entire 82 pages report actually reveals when the 20 pages that were censored pretty tells us she consented to everything that happened

A Huge Number of Women Have Children by Multiple Fathers.

Another one of those very revealing studies that are usually quietly reported and not picked up in considerable interest by the mainstream media was reported by the University of Michigan  back in 2011.  This particular study reveals the rates in which women are more and more than before, becoming mothers of children by multiple men. This is quite the slap in the face of our gynocentric society that keeps telling men, we can't keep it in our pants and are sexually irresponsible:

"The first national study of the prevalence of multiple partner fertility shows that 28 percent of all U.S. women with two or more children have children by more than one man.

She (Dorius) found that having children by different fathers was more common among minority women, with 59 percent of African American mothers, 35 percent of Hispanic mothers and 22 percent of white mothers with two or more children reporting multiple partner fertility. Women who were not living with a man when they gave birth and those with low income and less education were also more likely to have children by different men.

But she also found that multiple partner fertility is surprisingly common at all levels of income and education and is frequently tied to marriage and divorce rather than just single parenthood."

    And this research should be partnered up with the one that we previously posted that paternity fraud is 30% of all paternity. So a lot of these children these women have by multiple fathers are potentially children they are forced to either raise or pay child support for, or are children they aren't currently aware are theirs.

Radical Lesbian Feminist Alice Walker Hated Children and "Reclaimed" the Words "Slut" and "Nigger"

Alice Walker on her support for the Slutwalk and claiming the word "slut" as a positive thing:

"Guernica: Have you been following the 'SlutWalk' protests, the international movement borne out of remarks made by a Toronto police officer that 'women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not be victimized?' What are you thoughts on the movement?

Alice Walker: I’ve always understood the word 'slut' to mean a woman who freely enjoys her own sexuality in any way she wants to; undisturbed by other people’s wishes for her behavior. Sexual desire originates in her and is directed by her. In that sense it is a word well worth retaining. As a poet, I find it has a rich, raunchy, elemental, down to earth sound, that connects us to something primal, moist, and free."

https://www.guernicamag.com/daily/michael_archer_qa_with_alice_w/

And here she is claiming that the word used to oppress black men is something positive despite her depictions being nothing but stereotypical:

"I’ve always understood the word 'nigger' to mean a black man who freely enjoys his own laziness in any way he wants to; undisturbed by other people’s wishes for his behavior. Industrial desire originates in him and is directed by him. In that sense it is a word well worth retaining. As a poet, I find it has a rich, raunchy, elemental, down to earth sound, that connects us to something primal, indigent, and unencumbered by productivity."

http://www.femisex.com/content/alice-walker-reclaims-slut-and-nigger-valuable-women-and-blacks-calls-americans-terrorists

   Walker is a notorious lesbian who got wealthy depicting black men as animals in "Color Purple" which started a torrent of books and movies depicting all black men as dogs and savages. Her daughter just came out and wrote a piece on how Walker's radical feminist views almost destroyed her:

"You see, my mum taught me that children enslave women. I grew up believing that children are millstones around your neck, and the idea that motherhood can make you blissfully happy is a complete fairytale.
Family love? A young Rebecca with her parents
In fact, having a child has been the most rewarding experience of my life. Far from 'enslaving' me, three-and-a-half-year-old Tenzin has opened my world. My only regret is that I discovered the joys of motherhood so late - I have been trying for a second child for two years, but so far with no luck."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1021293/How-mothers-fanatical-feminist-views-tore-apart-daughter-The-Color-Purple-author.html

Women Against Rape's Survival Manual Teaches Women to Lie About, and Conceal Rape

In page 31 of Women Against Rape's Survival Manualthey basically train the rape accusers on how to lie about being asleep or unconscious at the time of the sexual contact even if they aren't sure they were raped, in order to sound convincing:

They also teach women to conceal an alleged rape from the police even though they might have medical evidence on page 8:

They tell women they also don't have to "be pushed" by the police to file a rape case, basically letting a supposed predator roam around free:

Feminists Claim Male Achievements and Misogyny are due to "Womb Envy".

In another episode of sheer psychological projection, feminists at the Women's Studies International Forum are now claiming the reason why men have achieved so much and helped to better the lives of everyone over the millennia, is due to the "fact" that we all are secretly jealous of women and their "goddess" like wombs:

And finally on pg 158 we get to the meat of the matter. They are basically claiming that "womb envy/jealousy" in men is the cause of all misogyny on the planet. Their source for this claim is Karen Horney who is credited with "founding" Feminist Psychology and is a series of outdated, untested theories from the 1920s:

Men Show More Emotional Control than Women.

Studies had to be carried out in order to confirm something that we'd be called "sexist" for even pointing out; that men tend to have more control over their emotions and act less hysterical than women, and also have the ability to help others regulate their own emotions.

 Source: Sex-Related Neuroanatomical Basis of Emotion Regulation Ability

Canadian Women Benefit from Social Assistance More than Men.

   Canadian women rank higher in beneficiaries from tax payers' social assistance like "Employment and Income Assistance", but despite all that, you'll hear feminists complaining how Canadian society benefits males the most:

The United Nations Admits Most Men in Third World Countries Oppose Female Genital Mutilation

The UN has now admitted that contrary to belief that FGM is associated with gender discrimination, most men and boys in third world countries oppose the practice. More men than women even oppose it in several of the countries where it is practiced the most. This admission will hopefully force the western media to resist blaming FGM on men-only in their reporting as they usually do in their articles. We won't hold our breath waiting on it though.



So far, to their credit, ABC News and the Washington Post have reported on the issue without altering the UN's statement.

The Canadian Government is Lying About Women Being the Primary Victims of Violence

The Canadian Government is purposefully lying about how many women compared to men are victims of violence in the country. We discovered just how deep the lying go after cross-examining the statistics on gender violence on their Government website recently. In the screenshot we combined three set of statistics from the Canadian Government, the first one is from them lying and saying that women account for 51% of the victims of violence in the country, the second set of statistics is from the SAME website where they are telling you that women don't even account for half as many victims of violence as men do. The third set of statistics shows that the overall trend in violence against women has been a decrease in the numbers but the media and the Government are telling us it's an epidemic in their press releases.

The "Chivalry is Dead" Myth Debunked by New Study

Chivalry is dead, men operate on a bias against women, men care less about women than they do about other men.

We've heard all of this before and we are hearing it constantly as the "war on women" rhetoric reaches a fever-pitch but this new groundbreaking study shows that both men and women would sacrifice men in order to save women if they had to choose.

This is why there will never be military draft that includes women in most countries. Quote:

"We’re More Likely to Protect Women Than We Are Men

We’re more likely to sacrifice a man than a woman when it comes to both saving the lives of others and in pursuing our self-interests, a team of psychology researchers has found.

“Our study indicates that we think women’s welfare should be preserved over men’s,” observes Oriel FeldmanHall, a post-doctoral researcher at New York University and the study’s lead author....

In the trolley scenario, subjects read one of three versions of the dilemma, where each vignette described a man, woman, or gender-neutral bystander on the bridge.

The participants were then asked how willing they were to “push the [man/woman/person] onto the path of the oncoming trolley” in order to save five others farther down the track.

The results showed that both female and male subjects were much more likely to push the male bystander or one of unspecified gender than they were the female bystander."

Girls Use Indirect Agression to Manipulate and Shame Competition.

    While it's that boys do tend to be more direct with their aggression, girls on the other end, learn through their verbal skills how to manipulate people, form groups in order to pressure or shame others.  Boys do tend to bully but girls are the ones who use the most peer pressure, and peer group in order to bully each other:

This was found in a study titled, "Do Girls Manipulate and Boys Fight?", where they have revealed that girls as young as 8, tend to use indirect means of aggression; such as passive-aggressiveness, manipulation and using groups to intimidate rivals. While not prevalent to girls of that age, the trend and frequency skyrocketed by ages 11 through 15 - which the study also revealed that adult women were the biggest users of indirect aggression:

  

And from another study title, "Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy?" women have been found to use the same types of passive aggressive strategies in order to exaggerate their own sexual value by shaming or defaming another women to other women, or the men they  target for sexual selection:

"Indirect aggression includes behaviours such as criticizing a competitor's appearance, spreading rumours about a person's sexual behaviour and social exclusion. Human females have a particular proclivity for using indirect aggression, which is typically directed at other females, especially attractive and sexually available females, in the context of intrasexual competition for mates. Indirect aggression is an effective intrasexual competition strategy. It is associated with a diminished willingness to compete on the part of victims and with greater dating and sexual behaviour among those who perpetrate the aggression."