The "Destroy the Joint" Feminist Page told a Massive Lie about the Australian Gender Pay Gap.

  The feminist page in Facebook called "Destroy the Joint" is claiming that in 2013 the gender wage gap for women is due to discrimination and the solution for solving that issue is to "add a penis":

"You will be absolutely delighted to discover that here at Destroy the Joint we have found the solution to the gender pay gap.
Now, with news that the Abbott Government is seeking to entrench the gender pay gap by reneging on a pre-election promise to fund a pay increase for childcare workers, Destroy the Joint has a solution.
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/comment/childcare-worker-betrayal-worsens-gender-gap-20131125-2y69z.html
For true pay equity, just Add-A-Penis. That's all it takes. No more talent, no more hours, no more experience. Just a penis.
The Abbott Government is reneging on childcare, wants to renege on Gonski reforms; and is about to launch an onslaught on ordinary Australians with the Commission of Audit. These moves will put the lives and incomes of ordinary Australians at risk - and we know that those on the lowest incomes are women."

 If you notice, right at the left hand bottom of the picture, we can see that they source the Australian Bureau of Statistics  yet when we looked into the data, we find out that Destroy the Joint lied by omission on the data and this is exactly what he discovered:

"b) Salary data may include additional payments such as overtime and bonuses. Figures therefore do not necessarily reflect award rates. An example is the case of medical graduates, whose base salary is increased markedly by overtime payments."

"The differences in overall median starting salaries between males and females can be partly explained in terms of the differing enrolment profiles of males and females. However, there are many other factors that can influence starting salary differences. While males and females may have studied in the same field, differing employment factors such as occupation, type and location of the employer, or the hours worked, can also have an impact on the earnings. (Endnote 2)"

"Analysis of differences between median starting salaries for male and female graduates should be performed with caution, as some fields of study (e.g. Optometry, Dentistry, Earth Sciences) tend to have low response numbers, and the difference obtained from the AGS may not actually exist for the overall graduate population"

And in fields like Earth Science, Physical Science, Computer Science, Engineering, Social Sciences women are actually out-earning men in starting salaries:

 As always, the feminist movement has to lie about the data and hide important information to have their fear-mongering sold.

Norma "Jane Roe" McCorvey lied about being Raped, Never had an Abortion and is a Pro-Life Activist.

    In case you didn't known, Norma MCorvey, the famous feminist icon whose case "Roe vs Wade" (based on her pseudonym) was used to legalize abortion, lied about her rape which caused her to become pregnant. She also has become a pro-life activist and she actually never had an abortion. Here's an interview she had with CNN where she reveals she has since become a pro life activist and was treated like an dumb mascot by the feminists who exploited her and then discarded her. Pay close attention on how dishonest and cowardly feminist groups are once one of their icons has a change of heart:

"Once an abortion-rights supporter, the 50-year-old McCorvey has switched sides: She's now a vocal anti-abortion activist. She has started a ministry called Roe No More to fight against abortion rights with the aim of creating a mobile counseling center for pregnant women in Dallas. 

The case was appealed to the Supreme Court, which handed down its controversial ruling on January 22, 1973. The decision legalized the right to an abortion in all 50 states and sparked a political debate that remains charged to this day.  

However, McCorvey, who was 21 when the case was filed and was on her third pregnancy, never had an abortion and gave birth to a girl, who was given up for adoption.

In a 1997 CNN interview, McCorvey blamed violence at women's clinics on the abortion-rights camp.
'I personally think it's the pro-abortion people who are doing this to collect on their insurance, so they can go out and build bigger and better killing centers,' she said.

Abortion-rights advocates were not so happy about the change of heart by the woman who symbolized a woman's right to have an abortion.
Sarah Weddington, the attorney who along with Linda Coffee represented the plaintiffs, now says she would have picked a different plaintiff, who might have better represented the case.

Coffee said she and Weddington met McCorvey via another attorney who specialized in adoptions. Coffee doesn't remember McCorvey having any hesitancy about wanting an abortion.

Asked why she thought McCorvey changed her mind, Weddington said, "She's the only one who can answer that," then refused to comment further about McCorvey. 

But McCorvey says that attitude validates her belief that abortion is wrong. 'If they don't care about me, how can they possibly care about anyone else?' she said.

When McCorvey announced her change of heart on the issue, Kate Michelman, president of the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League, said in a statement: The Roe vs. Wade decision 'isn't about any single individual. It is about the freedom of all women to make reproductive decisions free from government intrusion.'

Michelman, through a spokesman, declined to be interviewed for this story.
Coffee said she last saw McCorvey when the television movie about the case was made in the late 1980s.

'Perhaps she may have felt left out by some of the pro-choice groups in connection with the ongoing debate," she said.
That is exactly what McCorvey says about the pro-choice leaders. 'They could have been nice to me instead of treating me like an idiot,' she said."

    Look at how quickly feminists sold out their own icon and considered her a traitor who should have just have followed "the party's line" in this case. This is how much feminists really respect women with agency.

An in another interview reported by The News Journal ,she admits she made up the rape story in a fit of anger:

 

Whether you are pro or anti, the fact remains that this is another instance where feminists shaped our society by exploiting another woman yet again, based on lies and omission, and then discarded this woman when she came out opposing their views. This is how much they love women supposedly though. Norma McCorvey is actually trying to get the decision of the Supreme Court overturned:

Monotheistic Religions Had Certain Restrictions on Female Sexuality due to Paternity Issues, not Misogyny

      

      A study dating back to 2012 that never got media attention titled "Religion as a means to assure paternity" reveals that certain religious and communal restrictions on women were due not to oppress and control them as feminists would have you believe, but it was due to paternity issues and cuckoldery problems that could arise if not holding women accountable for their sexuality as we do men:

"The sacred texts of five world religions (Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, and Judaism) use similar belief systems to set limits on sexual behavior. We propose that this similarity is a shared cultural solution to a biological problem: namely male uncertainty over the paternity of offspring. 

Furthermore, we propose the hypothesis that religious practices that more strongly regulate female sexuality should be more successful at promoting paternity certainty. Using genetic data on 1,706 father–son pairs, we tested this hypothesis in a traditional 

African population in which multiple religions (Islam, Christianity, and indigenous) coexist in the same families and villages. We show that the indigenous religion enables males to achieve a significantly (P = 0.019) lower probability of cuckoldry (1.3% versus 2.9%) by enforcing the honest signaling of menstruation, but that all three religions share tenets aimed at the avoidance of extrapair copulation. 

Our findings provide evidence for high paternity certainty in a traditional African population, and they shed light on the reproductive agendas that underlie religious patriarchy."

   

Feminists balk, but there was a good reason after all for the existence of these religious rituals that appear, superficially to the comically stunted feminist mind, to be relics from an antediluvian past. Modernists think they can ignore the wisdom of their ancestors without consequence.

40% of College Age Women Have Admitted They Meant "Yes" When They Told a Man "No"

        40% of college age women have admitted that at least once in their life they meant "yes" when they told a potential sexual partner "no", but the feminist movement will tell you that women never send mixed messages and "no means no" all the time.

The same page in this book shows research that shows a part of women continued dating the men they later accused of rape, which pretty much confirms to us about the nature of these cases of women claiming false rape:

    
     
Source:  "Evolutionary Psychology and Violence: A Primer for Policymakers and Public Policy Advocates"
    
     Since then, not a single replication or investigation on this data has been done. What are they hiding?

Florida N.O.W. The State's Most Powerful Feminist Lobby Group Lies About Shared Parenting Bill During Opposition

The Florida National Organization for Women, the most powerful feminist lobby group in the state, has been lying continuously about the stated goals and intentions of SB Bill 668 and claiming that the bill mandates shared parenting in all circumstances after a divorce.

They are assuming the public and especially their feminist supporters will not read the actual bill to see what it says and this has enabled them to get away with this lie. This is not the first time The National Organization for Women has used this tactic before in its opposition to shared parenting. They have used the same lie repeatedly in several states to deny fathers equal time with their children after divorce. Here's the organization's deceptive statement on the bill. Quote:

"Press Release from Terry Sanders, President of Florida NOW:

Alimony bill bad for Florida women... Florida National Organization for Women demands Governor Scott veto the Alimony Bill... 

Another egregious injustice in the bill is the attempt to force 50/50 timesharing on all families regardless of the circumstances.

Child custody belongs completely outside of any alimony ‘reform’ legislation. The individual needs of the family and child should be the leading consideration by judges when deciding custody, not a generic formula that puts the child’s welfare at risk."

Ok now let's look on pages 17-19 of the legislation to see what the actual bill says. Quote:

"The court shall order that the parental responsibility for a minor child be shared by both parents unless the court finds that shared parental responsibility would be detrimental to the child...
If the court determines that shared parental responsibility would be detrimental to the child, it may order sole parental responsibility...

Whether or not there is a conviction of any offense of domestic violence or child abuse or the existence of an injunction for protection against domestic violence, the court shall consider evidence of domestic violence or child abuse as evidence of detriment to the child...

The court shall order sole parental responsibility for a minor child to one parent, with or without time-sharing with the other parent if it is in the best interests of the minor child...

A determination of parental  responsibility, a parenting plan, or a time-sharing schedule may 524 not be modified without a showing of a substantial, material, and unanticipated change in circumstances and a determination that the modification is in the best interests of the child.

Determination of the best interests of the child shall be made by evaluating all of the factors affecting the welfare and interests of the particular minor child and the circumstances of that family"
Here is NOW's statement juxtaposed side by side what the bill ACTUALLY says in image form.

So notice that nowhere in the bill does it say that children MUST spend an equal amount of time with the father regardless of the best interests of the child! This is a malicious lie by The National Organization for Women!

Jian Ghomeshi's Lawyer, Marie Henein Defeated the Biased Media Smear-Campaign Effortlessly

Jian Ghomeshi's Lawyer, Marie Henein, did an interview with the CBC where she was asked a set of very dishonest, loaded questions. She refuted the illogical, irrational, emotion-based arguments gracefully and defended the presumption of innocence in rape cases like a true champion. Standing up to these feminist lynch-mobs takes some courage and we see that on full display in this video.

Men Could Suffer Death Sentence for Rape During the Colonial Days

     During the days where feminists in the US love to claim men had all the power and controlled women like slaves, rape laws during the 1600's state that men could suffer the death penalty if found guilty of rape. Here's a source from the University of Virginia titled, "Sexual Misconduct in Plymouth Colony":

"Based on these cases, one can assume that the people of Plymouth operated under an unwritten code of moral conduct before 1636. The new laws embodied this code, and distinguished between capital and criminal sexual offences. 'Sodomy, rapes, and buggery"'were declared "capital offences lyable to death" (PCR 11:12)."

Interesting that the almighty patriarchy would kill men for raping the so-called second class citizens.