Canadian Women Benefit from Social Assistance More than Men.

   Canadian women rank higher in beneficiaries from tax payers' social assistance like "Employment and Income Assistance", but despite all that, you'll hear feminists complaining how Canadian society benefits males the most:

The United Nations Admits Most Men in Third World Countries Oppose Female Genital Mutilation

The UN has now admitted that contrary to belief that FGM is associated with gender discrimination, most men and boys in third world countries oppose the practice. More men than women even oppose it in several of the countries where it is practiced the most. This admission will hopefully force the western media to resist blaming FGM on men-only in their reporting as they usually do in their articles. We won't hold our breath waiting on it though.



So far, to their credit, ABC News and the Washington Post have reported on the issue without altering the UN's statement.

The Canadian Government is Lying About Women Being the Primary Victims of Violence

The Canadian Government is purposefully lying about how many women compared to men are victims of violence in the country. We discovered just how deep the lying go after cross-examining the statistics on gender violence on their Government website recently. In the screenshot we combined three set of statistics from the Canadian Government, the first one is from them lying and saying that women account for 51% of the victims of violence in the country, the second set of statistics is from the SAME website where they are telling you that women don't even account for half as many victims of violence as men do. The third set of statistics shows that the overall trend in violence against women has been a decrease in the numbers but the media and the Government are telling us it's an epidemic in their press releases.

The "Chivalry is Dead" Myth Debunked by New Study

Chivalry is dead, men operate on a bias against women, men care less about women than they do about other men.

We've heard all of this before and we are hearing it constantly as the "war on women" rhetoric reaches a fever-pitch but this new groundbreaking study shows that both men and women would sacrifice men in order to save women if they had to choose.

This is why there will never be military draft that includes women in most countries. Quote:

"We’re More Likely to Protect Women Than We Are Men

We’re more likely to sacrifice a man than a woman when it comes to both saving the lives of others and in pursuing our self-interests, a team of psychology researchers has found.

“Our study indicates that we think women’s welfare should be preserved over men’s,” observes Oriel FeldmanHall, a post-doctoral researcher at New York University and the study’s lead author....

In the trolley scenario, subjects read one of three versions of the dilemma, where each vignette described a man, woman, or gender-neutral bystander on the bridge.

The participants were then asked how willing they were to “push the [man/woman/person] onto the path of the oncoming trolley” in order to save five others farther down the track.

The results showed that both female and male subjects were much more likely to push the male bystander or one of unspecified gender than they were the female bystander."

Girls Use Indirect Agression to Manipulate and Shame Competition.

    While it's that boys do tend to be more direct with their aggression, girls on the other end, learn through their verbal skills how to manipulate people, form groups in order to pressure or shame others.  Boys do tend to bully but girls are the ones who use the most peer pressure, and peer group in order to bully each other:

This was found in a study titled, "Do Girls Manipulate and Boys Fight?", where they have revealed that girls as young as 8, tend to use indirect means of aggression; such as passive-aggressiveness, manipulation and using groups to intimidate rivals. While not prevalent to girls of that age, the trend and frequency skyrocketed by ages 11 through 15 - which the study also revealed that adult women were the biggest users of indirect aggression:

  

And from another study title, "Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy?" women have been found to use the same types of passive aggressive strategies in order to exaggerate their own sexual value by shaming or defaming another women to other women, or the men they  target for sexual selection:

"Indirect aggression includes behaviours such as criticizing a competitor's appearance, spreading rumours about a person's sexual behaviour and social exclusion. Human females have a particular proclivity for using indirect aggression, which is typically directed at other females, especially attractive and sexually available females, in the context of intrasexual competition for mates. Indirect aggression is an effective intrasexual competition strategy. It is associated with a diminished willingness to compete on the part of victims and with greater dating and sexual behaviour among those who perpetrate the aggression."

Female Hypergamy is an Adaptation Survival Strategy Rooted in Biological and Socio-economic Factors.

       Female hypergamy is a biological mechanism women developed for survival that is still very observable and and quantified nowadays in the 21st century despite our advances as a civilization. Many sex typical behaviors are rooted in our own inherent nature despite all the rationalization done by the feminists and neo progressives inside academia pulling their buzzwords like "patriarchy" and "social construct".
In this article, we will look at the science behind female sexual predilection and choices based purely on biological and psychological reasons. Women prefer more intelligent, creative and more masculine men who perform physical tasks, which produces stronger and more intelligent children:

Source: http://www.ehbonline.org/article/S1090-5138%2808%2900079-2/abstract?cc=y=

Source: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0013191570100106?journalCode=cedr20&

                              

Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130383/pdf/rstb20100404.pdf

       Women also prefer gifts and material wealth as signs of affection and romance, while men just see them as tools of courtship to gain sexual favors, as we can read in a study titled, " 'Heck with the flowers and candy—I just want sex!' Women’s and men’s agreement and disagreement about romance":

"As a concise definition of romance is virtually absent in the literature, based on our analysis of scientific and layperson construal of romance, we define it as an orientation toward a partner whereby 1 expresses love, caring, and sexuality to facilitate and solidify commitment. Of interest to the authors, men’s and women’s definitions of romance were similar, and they placed equal importance on romance in a committed relationship. However, men considered themselves to be less romantic than did women, and men considered romance to a means to sexual access more than did women. This evidence suggests that men, acknowledging its importance, may be just “playing the game” of romance to gain sexual access. These results can be interpreted through an evolutionary psychological framework vis-à-vis the fundamental reproductive differences between the sexes."

Women also associate sexual stimulation with material wealth, while seeing lower value objects as negative sexual stimuli, to the point of even upsetting them: all the while men placed no sexual value on wealth:

                         
 

Source: The Price Had Better Be Right: Women’s Reactions to Sexual Stimuli Vary With Market Factors

In another study, researchers examined the mate preferences in dating site that had a highly skewed sex ratio (646 men for 1,000 women). But despite all that, they still found that women remain highly selective of higher status men even during the study's "marriage squeeze" scenario:

Source: RATIONAL CHOICE AND EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY AS EXPLANATIONS FOR MATE SELECTIVITY

The Myth That Most Women Didn't Vote Because Their Husbands Didn't Allow Them To

The popular myth concerning the accepted history of women's voting rights is that women were ultra enthusiastic overall about voting but the men in their families were oppressing them and preventing them from voting.

The Pew Research Center however, detailed a survey of women from 1923 where 65% of the women chose not to vote and found that less than 3% of the women said that they didn't vote because their husbands didn't want them to.

A much higher percentage of them said they did not believe in voting than those who said that they didn't vote because their husbands didn't want them to (11% vs 3%).

46% of the women chose to vote for President versus 75% of the men.

This is vital information because it gives us a glimpse of what the mindset of women were like in large cities back then concerning suffrage as opposed to the myths.