Feminists Demand 100 Year Ban on Male Politicians and 50 Year Ban on Male Artists and Blame Men for War

Feminist award winning writer and director, Jill Soloway, and her girlfriend Eileen Myles, have written a feminist manifesto that demands reparations for women from men. The list of demands includes making it illegal for men to make any films, television shows, poetry, or writing for 50 years and for a 100 year ban on male Governmental officials. Quote:

"Eileen Myles, the lesbian poet portrayed as a fictional women's studies professor by Cherry Jones on Transparent, and Jill Soloway, the creator-director of Transparent, were watching porn together in Paris late last year. The partners were inspired to author a radical feminist manifesto after coming to the conclusion that the porn industry "distributes portrayals of almost exclusively male pleasure and climax."...

The manifesto includes a list of demands and one of those demands is that porn made by men be “outlawed for one hundred years.” They also called for a 50-year ban on men creating art such as film, television, poetry, and writing...

The showrunner and poet call for the end to male governance, blaming the obsession with war on men: "War is a cultural invention dreamed up by men." They, again, want men to have a hundred-year break from governing. They issue an invite to men to "enthusiastically join us in the toppling of this artificial masculinist hierarchy."...

On her website, Wifey.tv, Soloway calls for people to join the movement, get enraged, and "help us rewrite and rewrite the charter until all of this worldwide gun obsessed war obsessed men obsessed with other men silliness is over."

Women Utilize Social Media More Than Men

         "Cyber Violence Against Women" was a UN panel where professional damsels Anita Sarkeesian and Zoey Quinn took stage in order to put on a full display of histrionics equating online bullying and sexual harassment of women with physical violence. We have already posted on how men are the ones who actually receive most harassment and death threats, while the category where women are mostly the victims of sexually motivated harassment, is the minority of the percentages of all online aggression. 

And just as a catch, if women really were suffering from personal and physical injuries, why is it then, women outnumber men when it comes to using social media; specially when the evidence shows women are sharing more about their personal lives and connecting personally with people, while men tend to be more private and use social media towards their own ambitions?

Men and women have varying degrees of online activity across different sites. 74% of internet users are using social media, with women (76%) having a slight edge over men (72%):

   

Women also report having a higher percentage than men utilizing Mobile versions of Social Networking apps; men comprising 39% of users and women 41%:                                

Source: Pew Research Center: Social Networking Fact Sheet

       According to data by Women in Social Media, women are the majority of users of most social networking sites, while men use more media that advances their own interests in their professions and careers like LinkedIn:

Muslim Societies Mostly Favor Women's Individual Rights

     Despite the heavy Western feminist propaganda about the supposed oppression of Muslims women, under the control of their men, Muslims in general support women's choices of wearing a hijab in public and getting divorced.

Here on this report by the Pew Research Center, it is revealed that majority of Muslim countries positively support the rights of women whether they wear a hijab in public or not, while most differences resting on 50-50 average in attitudes:

Also, most Muslim societies support women's rights to divorce:

Most Muslims also support equal inheritance rights of boys and girls:

The National Organization for Women Killed Mixed Martial Arts Bill

The National Organization for Women, the largest, most influential feminist organization in the nation was instrumental in prevent Mixed Martial Arts from being legalized in New York State and they claimed that allowing men to perform the sport in the state would "endanger women".





Keep in mind as you read this, that this is the movement that claims women have no power and we live in a patriarchy. Quote:

"The National Organization for Women-NYS (NOW-NYS) is pleased to announce that legislation known as the "Cage Fighting" Bill will not pass in New York State. This New York Assembly Bill 6506 would have allowed professional human mixed martial arts events in our state... NOW-NYS was instrumental in making sure this legislation did not reach the floor for a vote...
"I am appalled that our legislators would even consider this bizarre bill, while declining to pass the Women's Equality Act, just because it secures women's reproductive health and rights. Imagine, the WEA would save lives and the 'Cage Fighting' Bill would endanger them. What does that say about those legislators?"
Mendez continued: "NOW-NYS has made it clear to Governor Andrew Cuomo (D) that this type of so called 'sport' would be detrimental to the lives and safety of women."


This is supposed to be a women's rights organization but time and time again, they are killing bills that would allow men to engage in activities that have nothing to do with preventing women's rights. Below you can see their letter to the Governor that successfully pressured him into withdrawing his support.

NOW Pressured Government to Remove Penalties for Mothers Who Abandon Children

The largest feminist organization, The National Organization for Women, pressured the Government to remove criminal penalties for mothers who abandon their children and didn't stop there.

When the politicians buckled under their pressure and removed the penalties they then pressured the Government to not even attempt to discover the identity of the mothers who abandoned their children so that the mothers could do so with more ease.

Notice how in this memo where they admit all of this, they start off pretending as though they were speaking for parents of both genders to be able to abandon their children but then make it abundantly clear that they are only interested in pressuring the Government to allow MOTHERS to do so.

Source: http://www.nownys.org/leg_memos_2010/abandoned_infants.pdf

This further illustrated the deep level of evil we are dealing with in opposing the feminist movement and why the damage they have caused throughout society cannot be underestimated.

Most Low Income Fathers Say They are Prevented by Child's Mother From Having More Active Role

In the publication titled "In Their Own Voices" from the US Department of Health and Human Services from last year, low income fathers demonstrated an overwhelmed stated interest to play a positive role in their children's lives.

One of the most commonly listed barriers they brought up that they say prevented them from being as active in their offspring's life was the child's mother preventing them from doing so.

Keep in mind that this is the father's side of the story and that we are not getting the mother's side in this case but we are providing you with the father's side since his side is so often overlooked especially from low income backgrounds. All of the information from the screenshot was obtained from pg 4.


Quote:

"As fathers, these men desired to “be there” for their children and to help them avoid the same
mistakes they had made. Either at the time of birth or later in their children’s lives, many realized that they had something else to live for—their children. Fatherhood was often credited for being a catalyst for making positive life changes, for themselves and for their children"

"According to the fathers, the most common barrier to their involvement with their children was the ongoing contentious relationships with the mothers of their children. A byproduct of these contentious relationships was gatekeeping by the children’s mothers, which according to the fathers often limited access to their children and made it hard for them to be the kind of fathers they wanted to be."

Female Leaders are Better Listeners Than Male Leaders Says Hillary and Vox

Female leaders are better listeners than male leaders according to the latest Hillary Clinton talking point. And of course the media is lapping it up as another opportunity for them to flaunt how much better than men they believe women are. Quote:

"Her gender is not only a core tenet of her campaign — she’s treating it as a competitive advantage....Clinton claims that women lead in substantively different ways — and that those differences are an advantage for her.

"I just think women in general are better listeners, are more collegial, more open to new ideas and how to make things work in a way that looks for win-win outcomes," she said...
Women in leadership roles, on average, are more cooperative and person-centric than men"



We do however know that women speak 13,000 more words per day than men on average so the idea that women are both listening more and speaking more than men on average sounds highly unlikely to me. Quote:

"Women do talk more than men — a lot more.

According to a new study by the University of Maryland School of Medicine, the average woman speaks about 20,000 words a day. The average man, meanwhile, speaks a mere 7,000 words."