Two Thirds of Women felt fairly Treated Compared to Men in 1970

      Two thirds of women when asked in 1970, said they were treated as equally as men despite the myth perpetuated by mainstream feminism about women being hopelessly oppressed in the United Stated back then. It makes sense if you recall that the men were drafted into the Vietnam war at that time overseas getting their legs blown off.

Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/109274976/2-Out-of-3-Women-Felt-They-Were-Treated-as-Fairly-as-Men-in-1970

Adolf "Handsome" Hitler was a Hit with Women

    Handsome Adolf Hitler is adored by women shown by The Pittsburgh Press Feb 6, 1933.

This is just to show that historically, it wasn't just men who supported the rise of the Third Reich, but women lusting after powerful Nazis as well.

The Milwaukee Journal March 31, 1937 shows women fawning over handsome Adolf Hitler as a sex symbol:

"Handsome Hitler Rates High as Ladies Man", The Milwaukee Journal - Dec 7, 1934

   

The Pittsburgh Press in 1930 talking about how women were Hitler's most loyal supporters even when everyone else deserted him early on.

"The Women Made Him" The Pittsburgh Press - Oct 5, 1930

But they tell us in school that he just came out of nowhere as this evil unforeseen menace that the heroic Allies had to defeat. I'm not debating that he was evil, but the idea that only men supported this psychopath is absurd.

Canadian Feminist Pioneer Emily Murphy Hailed as a "Hero" Wanted Mentally Disabled Women Sterilized

       Canadian Feminist pioneer Emily Murphy is hailed as a "hero for today" on the University of Alberta's website despite them including her call for the forced sterilization of handicapped women. 

How can you be touted as a hero for the rights of all women and yet help bring about the Government forcibly sterilizing women you label unfit? It's a similar pattern with many of the celebrated first wave feminist pioneers prior to the 1950s:

"One of the painful experiences of the magisterial life is to take from an insane and violent woman the little baby to which she has given birth during her parole; knowing that someday the child, in turn, is likely to be a patient, owing to the fact that its future was mortgaged before it was born. 

Awhile ago, in one of our institutions for the care of the aged, it was found that sixteen of the women were feeble-minded and that these had produced 116 mentally deficient children. 

Enquiring into this same matter of descent, it was found in Alberta that out of 3200 persons who had been treated for insanity, nearly 4000 children had been born. It is estimated that one out of every five of these children—that is to say 800 of them—will come ultimately as patients to a mental hospital.... It is quite true that there are tragedies that go on and on. This is one of them. 

Perhaps, after all, there is not so much credit in being a mother as being fitted to be one"

Rockefeller and Ford Foundation Fund Feminist Women's International Meeting of "Radicals" 1975

Here's more evidence of how entrenched and in cahoots feminism is with the powers that be, that according to gender studies professors in universities right now will tell you were hellbent on oppressing women with white male patriarchal and capitalist hegemony:

They had such multi-nationalists backing them up but a NOW representative has the audacity to say that the group had no power. That's to show you how far back feminists were damseling and claiming no large influence in society, despite their influence.

Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/105717710/Rockefeller-and-Ford-Foundation-Fund-Feminist-Women-s-International-Meeting-of-Radicals-1975

     

Rockefeller Foundation Helped Fund Feminist Press 1972

           In 1972, The Feminist Press received funds from the "patriarchal" Rockefellers in order to indoctrinate school teachers to brainwash children with feminism:


                                             

Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/105715545/Rockefeller-Family-Funds-the-Feminist-Press-in-1972#download   

        So, this yet ample proof of yet another collusion of feminism and the so-called patriarchal power structures. Do you smell the stench of corpses and skeletons inside feminists' closet yet? Of how misandric the entire system, and not just "feminists" is?

1970's Virginia Slims Ads Claim Women are Superior to Men

          "Feminist" Virginia Slims Advertisement from the 1970s telling women "You've come a long way baby, to get where you got to today".  In Stanford Research into the Impact of Tobacco Advertising, we can read how women's liberation type ads helped get women hooked on cigarettes as a way to oppose the patriarchy and show women as men's superiors and adversaries:

One of the most common techniques tobacco companies employ in order to target women is women's liberation. Specifically, these advertisements show a woman in a position of power over a man, while being careful to keep the power-play light, carefree, and a bit flirtatious. The ads are prudent, hoping not to offend anyone while appearing to 'take sides,' so to speak, with women. Often, these ads distract from the position of power Big Tobacco itself holds over both sexes, by pitting women against men instead of against Big Tobacco. "

Supreme Court Case Admits Justice Policy Creates Gender Conflict

In the Koira vs Metro Car Wash Supreme Court case the court actually admits that justice system policy keeps men and women at each other's throats: :

"Men and women alike suffer from the stereotypes perpetrated by sex-based differential treatment. (See Kanowitz, "Benign" Sex Discrimination: Its Troubles and Their Cure (1980) 31 Hastings L.J. 1379, 1394; Comment, Equal Rights Provisions: The Experience Under State Constitutions (1977) 65 Cal.L.Rev. 1086, 1106-1107.) When the law "emphasizes irrelevant differences between men and women[,] [it] cannot help influencing the content and the tone of the social, as well as the legal, relations between the sexes. ...


As long as organized legal systems, at once the most respected [40 Cal.3d 35] and most feared of social institutions, continue to differentiate sharply, in treatment or in words, between men and women on the basis of irrelevant and artificially created distinctions, the likelihood of men and women coming to regard one another primarily as fellow human beings and only secondarily as representatives of another sex will continue to be remote.


When men and women are prevented from recognizing one another's essential humanity by sexual prejudices, nourished by legal as well as social institutions, society as a whole remains less than it could otherwise become." (Kanowitz, Women and the Law (1969) p. 4.)
Whether or not these defendants consciously based their discounts on sex stereotypes, the practice has traditionally been of that character. For example, in Com., Pa. Liquor Control Bd. v. Dobrinoff (1984) 80 Pa.Cmwlth. 453 [471 A.2d 941], the trial court relied on just such a stereotype in upholding a tavern's cover charge distinction based on sex.



The court suggested that the purpose of the discount was "'chivalry and courtesy to the fair sex.'" (Id., at p. 943.) The appellate court held, however, that a variance in admission charge based "solely upon a difference in gender, having no legitimate relevance in the circumstances" violated the Pennsylvania Human Relation Act's prohibition against sex discrimination. (Ibid.)


Similarly, in striking down the New York Yankees "Ladies' Day" promotion, the New York State Human Rights Appeal Board observed that "the stereotyped characterizations of a woman's role in society that prevailed at the inception of 'Ladies' Day' in 1876" were outdated and no longer valid "in a modern technological society where women and men are to be on equal footing as a matter of public policy." (Abosh v. New York Yankees, Inc. (1972) No. CPS-25284, Appeal No. 1194, reprinted in Babcock et al., Sex Discrimination and the Law, supra, at pp. 1069, 1070.)


With all due respect, the Washington Supreme Court also succumbed to sexual stereotyping in upholding the Seattle Supersonics' "Ladies' Night." (MacLean v. First North. Industries of America, supra, 635 P.2d at p. 684.) The court found that the discount was reasonable because, inter alia, "women do not manifest the same interest in basketball that men do." (Ibid.) fn. 16


This sort of class-based generalization as a justification for differential treatment is precisely the type of practice prohibited by the Unruh Act. (See [40 Cal.3d 36] O'Connor v. Village Green Owners Assn., supra, 33 Cal.3d at p. 794; Marina Point, supra, 30 Cal.3d at pp. 739-740.) "[T]he Unruh Civil Rights Act prohibits all forms of stereotypical discrimination." (San Jose Country Club Apartments v. County of Santa Clara (1982) 137 Cal.App.3d 948, 952 [187 Cal.Rptr. 493].) These sex-based discounts impermissibly perpetuate sexual stereotypes"

Feminist Hero Victoria Woodhull Claims Sterilizing Girls is a Sign of Love

        Feminist icon, con artist and presidential candidate Victoria Woodhull on how forced sterilization of young girls is a sign of love in order to prevent the unfit from furthering their kind. Feminism was coupled with Eugenic elitism from the beginning, Margaret Sanger did not just pop up out of nowhere as we are led to believe. The quote from the picture can be found on page 47 of the book The Human Body the Temple of God: Or, The Philosophy of Sociology:

This is one of the heroes of the movement that claims to love women and girls.

Feminist Anita Sarkeesian Claims that Gender and Racial School Segregation Improves Learning

           Famous feminist con artist and fake gamer Anita Sarkeesian, made a tweet claiming and gender and racial segregation is beneficial for education. You cannot make this up, and this is the woman who is partnered with racially sensitive Social Justice Weasel Johnathan McIntosh:

Source: https://twitter.com/femfreq/status/119507163545731072

Brazilian Women File for Most Divorces

        Women in Brazil initiate over 70% of divorces but the feminist movement will tell you that Latin American countries are shitholes if you're woman though:

"According to information from IBGE published by the newspaper O Estado de S. Paulo , the 102 503 judicial separations in 2005, about 17,000 were ordered for women and 6000 for men only. This is due to the fact that, in general, they lose less than men. They stay with the house, the children receive a pension and are usually treated as victims."

But they are still the victims? Let's keep going:

"Women are calling for more separation than men. Civil registration data disclosed on Wednesday (25), IBGE (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics) showed in 2008 that 71.7% of non-consensual separations - ie one wants, but not the other - were requested by women." 

A greater percentage of women was observed by the institute in all Brazilian states, less in Paraíba, where 41.4% of non-consensual separations were ordered by men."
In cases of applications for divorce, the hegemony in the custody of minor children was women. In 2008, 88.7% of divorces granted in Brazil had custody for children granted to women.

The IBGE also noted that there was a decrease in the percentage of consensual separations in 2008 compared to 1998, reaching a difference of 4.9 percentage points. This reduction, according to the institute, was due to the increasingly common option for divorce or judicial direct their achievement in conveyancing, which avoids a step judicial and bureaucratic."

So women are the majority of people being awarded non-consensual divorces, but we men are the ones who are not mature for marriages though.

Source:  Women ask more separation than men IBGE survey says that 71.7% of non-consensual separations are requested by them

The Feminist Movement's Deeply Hateful Opposition to Men's Groups Being Allowed on Campus

Feminists and women's groups on campus have a long track record of opposing and blocking the formation of men's groups and men's centers on University campuses across the Western world. In this blog we will examine the most notable recent examples and in doing so, I will illustrate how their claims of being an oppressed, powerless class are bogus. Oppressed groups of people do not have the power to shut down the formation of groups representing their so-called oppressors in establishments that their so-called oppressors built themselves. Anyway, the first example is from Simon Fraser University where feminists opposed and eventually killed the proposals for the creation of a men's center. This is of course despite the fact that the University has it's own Women's Center already. Quote:

"In April, the Simon Fraser University student society voted to devote $30,000 of its budget toward the development of a men’s resource centre. The battle began soon after.

Resident feminists scoffed. Men? Needing a place to discuss their “issues?” Ridiculous. Men were the issue. Meanwhile, the SFU Women’s Centre had been fighting the good fight since 1974, and offering its small campus office as a haven. As for a men’s centre? Declared the Women’s Centre’s website — which, curiously, offers a “Male Allies” link, as if to enlist them — well, “the men’s centre is everywhere else."

So according to these feminists, men rule everywhere else except their magical Women's Center. The article goes on to reveal the fact that women's groups receive at least $80 million a year from the Government aka the patriarchy while men's groups don't even receive a $1 million. Quote:"Depending on the source, women’s organizations in B.C. receive between $80 million and $100 million from the provincial government. Men’s organizations, Boere said, receive $500,000." 
The next example is from Staffordshire University where the creation of a men's rights society last year was initially opposed on campus by a woman's group. After union bosses got involved and mediated between the two sides the women's group eased up a bit and gave lip service to being supportive. The issue was eventually put to a vote which to our knowledge was a vote of "NO" because there is no listing of a men's society on the University's website yet.




Quote:
"Students will vote on whether a controversial Men’s Rights Forum should go ahead at Staffordshire University in Stoke-on-Trent.

Student Vajra Dhatu posted a proposal to create a society version of the forum on the university’s Student Union “better Staffs forum” page.

But members of the Woman’s Network led by Fiona Wood caused a storm when they protested against the plan."


Our next incident is from last year as well. Students at Western University were opposed by feminist professors for attempting to create a men's group.




Quote:

"Although a few universities across Canada have banned men’s issues groups, Western’s University Students’ Council would hypothetically allow such groups — as long as they abide by Western’s club rules... Jessica Cameron, adjunct professor in women’s studies and feminist research, is not very supportive of men’s issues clubs.

“My concern of course with men-only groups is that historically so many groups have been men-only groups and they’ve been about the maintenance of patriarchal social relations,” Cameron said... Cameron does not see a need for a men’s group, unless it had a goal of something, such as reducing men’s violence against women.

“If our aim is gender equality, we don’t have to worry about advocating specifically for men,” Cameron said."




CBC News did an interesting news video on the creation of men's groups being opposed on campus and at 4:19 in the video a feminist writer for Buzzfeed says that the mere presence of men's groups on campus would have her living in fear. Quote:

"Yeah it would make me nervous, if I'm a woman that goes to a University and there's a Men's Rights Group that's right next door of course that would make me nervous... I don't think that they should exist."




And last but not least, at Ryerson University a men's group failed  to receive a yes vote for ratification on campus after feminists claimed they would be living in fear as women if there was a men's group on campus. They also accused the men's group of working with a "hate group", namely CAFE which is short for The Canadian Association For Equality. They never gave any proof to support their assertion that CAFE is a hate group of course.



Quote:


"The Ryerson Students’ Union (RSU) rejected the last appeal by the Men’s Issues Awareness Society (MIAS) to become an officially sanctioned student group.

RSU president Andrea Bartlett said that the group cannot appeal any further... Several directors said that MIAS’ recognition as a student group would make female staff and students at Ryerson feel unsafe...“When there are women who are attending these spaces because they want to see what’s being talked about, how will you ensure that there are no voices that are targeting or oppressing anyone else?” said Carolyn Myers, equity correspondent for the Board of Governors....

A working relationship with CAFE — which several RSU directors consider a hate group — has also hindered Arriola’s efforts. In December’s meeting, Arriola promised the RSU he wouldn’t invite anyone from CAFE.

“We are willing to work with you guys,” he told the committee. “We won’t have CAFE here, anyone who ever speaks to CAFE [we] will eliminate them from the pool."
Robyn Urback at the National Post wrote an excellent article going into more detail on the fanatical feminist opposition to men having any groups just for them on campus in Canada so be sure to check her article out for further reading. To anyone reading our blog, please message us if we missed any incidents of note.

Feminist Hero Margaret Sanger Hated Charity and the Disabled

       The iconic feminist hero Margaret Sanger, who also founded Planned Parenthood, was an adamant adversary to charities towards the poor and disabled.

Not only was Sanger a Eugenicist she was also a Neo-Malthusian who carried a deep hatred for charity due to it's preservation of "lesser strains" of people she thought would be better off removed from the gene pool. She actually devotes an entire chapter in her book "Pivot of Civilization " condemning charity in a chapter revealingly enough titled "The Cruelty of Charity" that chapter starts on page 59 in the book:

"Even if we accept organized charity at its own valuation, and grantthat it does the best it can, it is exposed to a more profoundcriticism. It reveals a fundamental and irremediable defect. Itsvery success, its very efficiency, its very necessity to the socialorder, are themselves the most unanswerable indictment. Organizedcharity itself is the symptom of a malignant social disease.

Those vast, complex, interrelated organizations aiming to control andto diminish the spread of misery and destitution and all the menacingevils that spring out of this sinisterly fertile soil, are the surestsign that our civilization has bred, is breeding and is perpetuatingconstantly increasing numbers of defectives, delinquents anddependents. My criticism, therefore, is not directed at the``failure'' of philanthropy, but rather at its success."

But hey this doesn't stop her from being held up as a hero for girls and celebrated as the best of humanity!:

http://myhero.com/hero.asp?hero=m_sanger

John Harvey Kellogg the man the Cereal is Named After was Circumcision and Eugenics Fanatic.

     One of the leading advocates of circumcision was John Harvey Kellogg(inventor of corn flakes). He advocated the consumption of Kellogg's corn flakes to prevent masturbation:

"Kellogg continued experiments with different cereals. In 1898, he introduced another health food known as 'Corn Flakes.' Corn Flakes — like Graham Crackers and Granola — were designed to avoid inflaming the sexual appetite. At that time, they were not sweetened with sugar. Kellogg believed that sugar was unhealthy and associated with vice and degeneracy."

He also believed that circumcision would be an effective way to eliminate masturbation in males In his book, The Home Book of Modern Medicine: A Family Guide in Health and Disease, Volume 2 we can seep into the mind of one of the leading fanatics promoting this misandric agenda:

"Covering the organs with a cage has been practiced with entire success. A remedy which is almost always successful in small boys is circumcision, especially when there is any degree of phimosis. The operation should be performed by a surgeon without administering an anesthetic, as the brief pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially if it be connected with the idea of punishment, as it may well be in some cases. 

The soreness which continues for several weeks interrupts the practice, and if it had not previously become too firmly fixed, it may be forgotten and not resumed. If any attempt is made to watch the child, he should be so carefully surrounded by vigilance that he cannot possibly transgress without detection. If he is only partially watched, he soon learns to elude observation, and thus the effect is only to make him cunning in his vice"

    

This guy was so sadistic that he saw circumcision as a form of punishment for masturbation without administering anesthetic, and advised tying boys in contraptions like in torture devices. Now we know why until recently, circumcision was performed without anesthetics.

He was also a racist, very active in the Eugenics movement, and founded The Race Betterment Foundation 1906. Kellogg was outspoken on his beliefs on race and segregation, though he himself raised several black foster children. Kellogg was in favor of racial segregation and believed that immigrants and non-whites would damage the gene pool:

Source:  From a Race of Masters to a Master Race: 1948 To 1848

Women's Liberation Promotes Matriarchy in Gloria Steinem's Meeting

During a meeting hosted by second wave feminist icons Gloria Steinem and murderer sympathizer Tri-Grace Atkinson, the feminist movement was adamantly promoting a matriarchal society with women at the top of every institution. These are the roots of the group who keeps telling you to read a dictionary definition of "feminism", whenever you call their movement a hate group and about female superiority:

   
Source: http://issuu.com/prenticereid/docs/women_s_lib_promotes_matriarchy_at_

Feminist Recceca Felton Called for the Lynching of 1000 Black Men

        Despite the feminist movement always trying to portray women as some sort of minority group together with racial minorities, they can constantly be found making inflammatory and racist remarks towards men of color.

Here's first wave feminist Rebecca Felton's thoughts on black men, when it came to interracial relationships. From PBS:

"Rebecca Felton, a Georgia feminist a year earlier: 'f it requires lynching to protect woman's dearest possession from ravening, drunken human beasts, then I say lynch a thousand negroes a week ... if it is necessary.'

Study Reveals that Men Don't Find Negative Masculine Traits Admirable

      Despite what the zealots of the religion of feminism would like you to believe, men across the world do not view the so-called "toxic masculinity" as something to emulate or to admire.

A study reported by Indiana University reveals that men from different nations rank respect, health and good relationships with their wives and family as more important than sex appeal or promiscuous:

"Contrary to stereotypes about sexual performance and masculinity, men interviewed in a large international study reported that being seen as honorable, self-reliant and respected was more important to their idea of masculinity than being seen as attractive, sexually active or successful with women. 

The study published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine included interviews with more than 27,000 randomly selected men from eight countries (Germany, U.S., U.K., Spain, Brazil, Mexico, Italy and France), with about 16 percent of the men reporting erectile problems. 

Regardless of age or nationality, the men more frequently ranked good health, harmonious family life and good relationships with their wife or partner as more important to their quality of life than material, self-fulfilling or purely sexual concerns."

Radical Feminist Angela Davis' ties to Communism, the CIA and Anti Black Male Bigotry

        Angela Davis, the famous Black Panther activist and professor of feminist studies, had deep ties within the so-called patriarchy of her time, and was mentored by a OSS/CIA agent who worked for the US propaganda dept named Herbert Marcuse. Here's an article from The University of Virginia describing her as a radical feminist scholar and vice president candidate for the Communist Party in the US:

"Radical feminist, activist, author, and scholar, Angela Davis first became known nationally and internationally as a fugitive after being charged as a conspirator in the failed attempt to free George Jackson, who was one of the Soledad Brothers, from prison in 1970. She was imprisoned for sixteen months. 

Although Davis was later fully acquitted, she was the third woman to appear on the FBI’s Most Wanted List. Davis became a symbol of racial injustice for the Black Power and Black Panther movement. After her arrest and imprisonment in 1970, her case became an international cause, inspiring the “Free Angela” movement. Following her release from prison, Davis moved to Cuba in support of fellow radicals. Davis has run for U.S. Vice President on the Communist Party ticket twice."

And here's a transcript from the video interview that can be accessed in the full transcript of the article:

BOND: "Were there particular people — teachers, particularly — who had an influence on you who shaped you in some way or the other?"


DAVIS: "Well, I suppose during my career as a student, the teacher who most influenced me was Herbert Marcuse."

Here is her page from University of California showing how influential she is to feminism:

Together with Kimberlé Crenshaw and others, she formed the African American Agenda 2000, an alliance of Black feminists that opposed the Million Men March which they claimed would revive "black male sexism":

Here's Herbert Marcuse's bio in the CIA page describing him as an OSS asset as well and his communist work for the CIA :

 "Franz Neumann, Herbert Marcuse, and Otto Kirchheimer were leading members of the Central European Section (CES). They were also Marxists—or communists, as some would later have it—and advocates of the Frankfurt School of thought formulated during their prewar association with the Institute of Social Research in Frankfurt, Germany. Each had written widely on the evils of Nazi Germany, and in the OSS they applied their knowledge to explaining that political movement and later to discussing social alternatives in the postwar era. Secret Reports On Nazi Germany contains 31 of the studies they produced during and after the war."

And here he describes his employment under the U.S Propaganda Department:

"MARCUSE: 'At first I was in the political division of the OSS and then in the Division of Research and Intelligence of the State Department. My main task was to identify groups in Germany with which one could work toward reconstruction after the war, and to identify groups which were to be taken to task as Nazis. There was a major de-Nazification program at the time. Based on exact research, reports, newspaper reading, and whatever, lists were made up of those Nazis who were supposed to assume responsibility for their activity. . .'

And the same article previously describes him as the author of The New Left:

"Herbert Marcuse’s Reason and Revolution (1941) brought the critical social theory of the twentieth century Frankfurt School to the USA, and with it, the spark that would become the New Left and student movements here during the 1960s and 1970s"

     Yet another feminist, like Gloria Steinem, that had deep involvement with the so-called branches of patriarchal control like the CIA. Steinem herself having ties with the CIA and the Ford Foundation. Seems to me that the establishment has a very feminist and anti-male bias.

The Blatant Double Standards of the U.S Military

      Men, who have been fighting for this country for hundreds of years, never got to enjoy their families due to not having access to extended paternity leave, which can be understandable as one makes a choice to become a soldier and forfeit his civilian life. But the same is not applied to women who become soldiers when it comes to them becoming pregnant.

The entire military apparatus just declared that soldiers who get pregnant, are going to be guaranteed extended paid maternity leave. The Hill reports:

"Women in the Army and Air Force will soon be getting twice as much paid maternity  leave, Defense Secretary Ash Carter announced Thursday.
'This puts the DOD in the top tier of institutions nationwide,” he said of the new policy that gives women in all branches of the military 12 weeks for paid maternity leave.'

Carter also pledged to increase time off for paternity leave, expand healthcare benefits for service members trying to start a family, increase hours of military child care facilities and allow some troops to stay at the base of their choice. 

'Fairness is important, but always, always mission effectiveness of our force comes first,”'he said. 'We’re not Google. We’re not Wal-Mart. We’re fighters. That does not mean we should be not be challenging ourselves just like the private sector.' 

Carter’s announcement is the latest move toward gender parity at the Pentagon, following his decision late last year to open all combat positions to women. 

For the Navy and Marines, the 12-week standard is actually a reduction in paid maternity leave. Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, who also oversees the Marines, had announced over the summer that the two branches would allow 18 weeks for maternity leave. 

Carter settled on 12 weeks, he said, as he felt it balances both competitive leave and readiness. Sailors and Marines who are already pregnant will be able to take the 18 weeks promised to them, Carter added. 

'Twelve weeks is extremely generous,' he said. 'It puts us in the very top tier of American employers. We leaned very far forward.'
For paternity leave, Carter wants to raise it from 10 to 14 days. Changes to paternity leave will require approval from Congress.

We supposedly leave in a patriarchy but female soldiers are not held to the same standards when it comes to pregnancy as male soldiers are. Female soldiers cannot be court-martialed nor have their illegal pregnancies during military service tar their record and not get in the way of future promotions. From CNN:

"The commander who instituted a policy cracking down on pregnancy among soldiers defended it Tuesday as necessary to maintain troop strength, but said no soldier would ever be court-martialed for violating the directive.

While violation of any of the rules in 'General Order Number 1' could lead to court-martial, Cucolo said he never intended such a drastic punishment for pregnancy.'I believe that I can handle violations of this aspect with lesser degrees of punishment,' Cucolo told reporters. "I have not ever considered court-martial for this. I do not ever see myself putting a soldier in jail for this. 

To date, he said, there have been eight cases of women getting pregnant while deployed under his command. Four were given letters of reprimand that were put in their local files, which means they would not end up in their permanent files and they would not be a factor in being considered for promotions. The four other women found out they were pregnant soon after they deployed; because they were not impregnated while deployed, no disciplinary action was taken."

So female soldiers really do not suffer any real consequences for undisciplined behavior and will actually get paid maternity leave, and to make matters worse, so-called "unplanned" pregnancies are on the rise in the military. From The Huffington Post:

"The unplanned pregnancy rate among active-duty women in the military is high and on the rise, according to a new study that analyzed Department of Defense survey data. 

'It's significantly higher than in the United States population, and it seems higher than the rate in 2005,'  study author Daniel Grossman, an assistant clinical professor in obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive sciences a the University of California San Francisco and vice president for research at Ibis Reproductive Health, told The Huffington Post. 

'It's counterintuitive. This population has really good access to medical care,' he continued. 'It's concerning that, perhaps, contraceptive access is still a problem.'
Grossman and his colleagues analyzed a sample of more than 7,000 women, aged 18 to 44, who had answered questions about pregnancy as part of a 2008 Department of Defense survey of health behaviors among each service branch. 

The findings, which they compared to the previous survey, conducted in 2005, were published in the February issue of the journal Obstetrics and Gynecology, released Wednesday. 

Overall, 10.5 percent of women in the latest survey said they'd had an unplanned pregnancy in the past year. That is higher than the 2005 rate of 9.7 percent and -- when adjusted for age -- also substantially higher than national estimates, the authors claim. 

The age-adjusted unintended pregnancy rate in 2008 was 78 per 1,000 women, according to the new study. That number is 50 percent higher than the unplanned pregnancy rate in the general population, which recent estimates put at 52 per 1,000 women. Younger, less educated, nonwhite and married or co-habitating women had the highest rates of unintended pregnancy. 

The new study is also among the first to look at unplanned pregnancies in deployed women. The unplanned pregnancy rate among women who went overseas was on par with those who had not. That means, the authors write, that efforts to improve pregnancy prevention need to happen among all active-duty servicewomen, at home bases and during deployment. Unplanned pregnancy also prevented deployment for many women. Overall, 11 percent of female service personnel scheduled to ship out were not able to in the previous year because of a pregnancy."

The Ties Between the Women's Suffrage and the New Age Movement

      Unbeknownst to many, the Theosophical Society has been a strong ally of the Suffragettes during the times of first wave feminism. And as it was typical of the women of that movement, they had their husbands' or fathers' fortune sponsoring them. Here's the bio on some of them by Theosophy Forward:

"Countess Muriel De La Warr (née Brassey 1872-1930), became a member of the Theosophical Society as an active suffragette. According to her close friend, the Christian Socialist George Lansbury, Muriel did not pride herself on her progressive work and her financing of the movement. Lansbury was one of the founders of the Daily Herald and a fervent supporter of women’s rights, and his campaigns were largely funded by Muriel."

Countess Muriel and her sister were known suffragettes, and her sister was a homewrecker having affairs with numerous men:

"The marriage ended in 1902 and Muriel went on to be a suffragette, as did her eldest daughter Idina. Idina, however, became famous as a “bolter,” someone who lives a very promiscuous life. She married five times and was the scandal of the English peerage.

The story doesn't end there, and the article reveals that many suffragettes were bedding married men:

"The Lutyens family was directly related to former Prime Minister Arthur Balfour (1902-1905). Balfour’s brother, Eustace, was an alcoholic architect who married Lady Frances Campbell, and this somewhat bohemian couple became close friends with the painter Edward Burne-Jones and his wife. All these women were committed suffragettes."

In the book History of Woman Suffrage by prominent suffragists Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B Anthony, it is stated that the only sect that supported women's suffrage was the Spiritualists:

Famous suffragette Emmeline Pankurst hosted Theosophical Society's president and fellow suffragette Annie Besant in her own household to share her beliefs:

Source: Emmeline Pankhurst: A Biography

Here's Mitch Horowitz, author of  Occult America(a New Age fanatic himself) bragging about Feminism's links

NOW International Conference Excluded Men in 1973

         During an international feminist conference hosted by the National Organization for Women's chapter in Massachusetts in 1973, the question about allowing male feminist to participate arose during the organization of the meeting, and it was not well met by most feminists attending. Here are a few excerpts from The Milwaukee Sentinel on how rabid feminists got on an article named "No Male Feminists, Conference Decrees":

This convention was also hosting women from countries from Latin America, Europe and Scandinavia, and the total group (also with some NOW members) was vehemently against allowing men to attend, and the voted men out from attending. In another attempt by a majority of white feminists, they tried to compare white women's struggle with the hardships of black Americans by claiming black activists would not allow whites in their conferences so why should feminists allow men?

This is how bad the feminist movement hated men, that they created total chaos when just the idea of allowing men who sympathize with their cause was just mentioned.

NOW's Agenda to Replace Legislators With their Own Members

       The president of National Organization for Women, Judy Goldsmith, in 1982, claimed she was going to train feminist politicians to replace those legislators whom she claimed were standing against women's rights. From The Milwaukee Sentinel:

From very early days, the feminist movement had an agenda to place their own pawns into positions of power. Now we know why things are the way they are now.

Equitas, The World League for the Rights of Men, Was Made Up Largely of Women Members

     During the early 1900's, Equitas, the Vienna based men's rights organization, (which comprised of also men from other nations) was largely made up of women who were mothers of bachelors who wanted to protect their sons from corrupt women due to the biased social enabling of female misbehavior and a corrupt justice system that would make men slaves to women through marriage:

Source: https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1499&dat=19301010&id=UpAWAAAAIBAJ&sjid=4yEEAAAAIBAJ&pg=4649,114510&hl=en

The organization was eventually disbanded due to lack of support of unwilling men who did not attend its conventions. Men took their own issues so light that the last members to survive the league were the women. That's something to consider when we are told by feminist that men care only about ourselves the most. Here's the The Montreal Gazette  reporting on it:

Men Were Legally Responsible for the Acts of Wives in the 1800's

       The feminist movement loves to claim that wives were nothing but the properties of men back in the 1800's, but according to the law, husbands were held legally responsible for their wives and would be punished in their place for any crime, breach of contract or immoral behavior; and public opinion in society went even further to state to say that it was men's job to constantly police their wives to make sure they weren't doing anything wrong. Here's the Putnam's Monthly Magazine chapter titled: "A Word for Men's Rights" reports:

So not only the law, but society required out of husbands the personal and legal obligation to babysit their wives at the expense of their lives. Now we know why we are neck deep in a culture that treat women as children with no agency that can do no wrong, where men are supposed to white knight at the snap of a damsel's fingers.

Women Committed For Addiction No longer Will be Sent to Prison

        In another epic moment of gynocentrism, the House and the Senate made it illegal to send women to prison over drug addictions, whereas men are committed to minimum security prisons.

Here's the report from the Boston's local ABC affiliate:

Thursday the House and Senate voted to make it illegal to civilly commit women with addictions to prison. 

5 Investigates was granted exclusive access inside MCI Framingham last fall. It found more than 1,000 women had been sent to this prison unit over just five years, simply because they struggle with addiction and had been "sectioned" or civilly committed by a judge. 

While locked up, they're not allowed access to addiction help and programs that are available to the inmates. 

WCVB first exposed this practice 25 years ago, in a three-part series by Susan Wornick. At the time, she was told the practice would end.
Last fall, reform was finally recommended, coming from Gov. Charlie Baker in his bill to combat the opioid epidemic. 

And today the House and Senate agreed to make it illegal to "section" addicted women to prison. 

That marks the end of a long battle, according to the ACLU. 

'After 25 years and a lawsuit we are glad to see they were able to come together and pass a bill to hopefully end this illegal practice,' says Jessie Rossman. 'No one should be sent to prison because they're suffering from the disease of addiction.' 

The bill now heads to the governor's desk. He says he wholeheartedly supports it and will sign it. His team is now working to build a new secure facility in Taunton for sectioned women.

All the while, men have to be imprisoned for the same crime in Massachusetts and aren't said to be sick like the woman in the video implied how women had a "disease". From the Massachusetts Alcohol and Substance Abuse Center:

"The Massachusetts Alcohol and Substance Abuse Center is a truly unique Department of Correction facility. The facility houses two (2) very distinct populations: criminally sentenced, minimum-security, male inmates and civilly committed males participating in an up to 90-day detoxification program. Individuals participating in the program are committed to the facility under MGL 123, Section 35.

Inmates work in a variety of job assignments at the facility. Job assignments are intended to provide the offender with opportunities for positive behavioral change while developing work skills and dependable work ethics. Good time is granted for those inmates in paid job assignment positions."