National Organization for Women's Direct ties to Marxism and their Anti-Family Agenda.

   This particular article was written by pioneering feminist man-hater Mallory Millet and in it she comes clean about how her sister Kate Millet stated that her and the largest feminist group, The National Organization for Women were hell-bent on destroying the family. Quote from Front Page Magazine :

"It was 1969. Kate invited me to join her for a gathering at the home of her friend, Lila Karp. They called the assemblage a "consciousness-raising-group," a typical communist exercise, something practiced in Maoist China.

We gathered at a large table as the chairperson opened the meeting with a back-and-forth recitation, like a Litany, a type of prayer done in Catholic Church. But now it was Marxism, the Church of the Left, mimicking religious practice:

They proceeded with a long discussion on how to advance these goals by establishing The National Organization of Women...

“And how do we make Cultural Revolution?" she demanded.
"By destroying the American family!" they answered.
"How do we destroy the family?" she came back.
"By destroying the American Patriarch," they cried exuberantly...

Katie said, "Come to New York. We're making revolution! Some of us are starting the National Organization of Women and you can be part of it...

The only way to do this was "to invade every American institution. Every one must be permeated with ‘The Revolution’": The media, the educational system, universities, high schools, K-12, school boards, etc.; then, the judiciary, the legislatures, the executive branches and even the library system."

If anyone needed more proof of the ties of Marxism and feminism, here it is folks! And they had some common goals. Wonder why your political, educational, media, entertainment, academic, military establishments are all basically sold out no more! We have solid proof of a conspiracy.

American Women's Femininity has Dramatically Decreased Since the 70's

  Feminist psychologists proudly bragged about the fact that American women's femininity has decreased since the beginning of the height of the feminist movement's power during the 70's.

They carried out a study where they measured male and female typical gender attitudes and levels of androgyny, and found that men have pretty much remained in the same roles while women have become more androgynous and masculine.

The study already starts by feminists patting each other on the back and describing their findings:

 

Despite admitting that women in the U.S have become less and less feminine, these feminists are still contradicting themselves by saying that just because women are becoming more masculine, that doesn't mean they are abandoning femininity but
are "re-defining" what it means to be feminine by using a term called "bodily property" that is based on "willpower, discipline and social standing", which ironically are traditional male attitudes. 

Source: Masculine and Feminine Traits on the Bem Sex-Role Inventory, 1993–2012: a Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis

Yet when we look at more objective and empirical evidences based on hard science, traditional femininity is rooted in evolutionary sexual selection and parenting styles that creates an optimal environment for the propagation of the human race:

 "Psychological evidence suggests that sex differences in morphology have been modified by sexual selection so as to attract mates (intersexual selection) or intimidate rivals (intrasexual selection).

Women compete with each other for high quality husbands by advertising reproductive value in terms of the distribution of fat reserves and by exaggerating morphological indicators of youthfulness such as a small nose and small feet and pale, hairless skin.

Men's physical appearance tends to communicate social dominance, which has the combined effects of intimidating reproductive rivals and attracting mates. In addition to their attractiveness and intimidatory effects, human secondary sexual characters also provide cues to hormonal status and phenotypic quality consistent with the good genes model of sexual selection (which includes parasite resistance).

Low waist-hip ratio is sexually attractive in women and indicates a high estrogen/testosterone ratio (which favors reproductive function). Facial attractiveness provides honest cues to health and mate value. The permanently enlarged female breast appears to have evolved under the influence of both the good genes and the runaway selection mechanisms."

 Source: The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology

Source: The functional neuroanatomy of maternal love: mother's response to infant's attachment behaviors

Women Prison Workers are Majory of those who Lust after Criminals

    A new study by the University of Montreal reveals the fact that female prison workers who should know better than to get involved with criminals, are the majority of the ones who lust after inmates, while male workers are in the minority.

Not only female prison guards were the ones getting involved with criminals but clinicians, including criminologists, psychologists, and nurses; and women comprise 70% of those romantically involved with criminals compared to 30% of men.

Quote from the Daily Mail:

"The official term for lusting after people with a criminal record is known as hybristophilia and has been studied by Dr Philippe Bensimon at the University of Montreal.

In a study published in the journal Déliquance, justice et autres questions de société, the researcher focused on more than 300 cases of the phenomenon in the US and European media over a ten-year period, from 2005 to 2015.

For all of the instances, the prison workers were dismissed from their roles and some even from their professions entirely.

The study found women were more affected than men, with over 70 per cent of cases of sexual misconduct in US correctional system involving female staff, despite them making up less than half of the prison workforce.

According to Dr Bensimon, this skewed proportion may be due to the roles in which women typically work, which could lead to emotional bonds forming between staff and inmates.

'This is possibly explained by the fact that women occupy mainly professional positions,' he said.

'For example, in Canada, many correctional facilities for men are mostly made up of women clinicians, including criminologists, psychologists, and nurses.' "

International Data Suggests Women are half to Blame for Partner Violence

   A study carried out by Murray A. Straus from the University of New Hampshire titled "Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations" revealed that women were responsible for half of the perpetrated partner violence in The group studied.

 The study further questions the lie that it is mostly men being violent and domineering in relationships, and female dominance is more closely correlated to partner violence than male; also that abuse programs need to end their female biased services whereas men are vastly ignored or treated as the abusers themselves:

  

 It is further revealed that female-only violence is more frequent than male-only; and that the types of injuries committed by both genders are almost the same, unlike most feminists claim:

     The author was bold enough to reveal how even in the so-called patriarchal nations, these results are to be found. Another pretty eye opening admission from this study is that the author heavily criticized the government for refusing to fund programs for male victims and how the feminist movement holds a monopoly on gendered programs and is to blame for the bias that ignores half of the perpetrators based on the "Duluth" model of domestic violence:

     More important details can be found in the part where the study shows that female dominance is more correlated to partner violence than male dominance, and that male chivalry may be responsible for males not retaliating as much:

     One last detail that puts to rest another famous feminist lie, is that this study also reveals that severe injuries are almost as likely to be female-perpetrated in cases of more serious violence; 85% male compared to 74% female, female-only severe assaults being higher than male-only:

The "Destroy the Joint" Feminist Page told a Massive Lie about the Australian Gender Pay Gap.

  The feminist page in Facebook called "Destroy the Joint" is claiming that in 2013 the gender wage gap for women is due to discrimination and the solution for solving that issue is to "add a penis":

"You will be absolutely delighted to discover that here at Destroy the Joint we have found the solution to the gender pay gap.
Now, with news that the Abbott Government is seeking to entrench the gender pay gap by reneging on a pre-election promise to fund a pay increase for childcare workers, Destroy the Joint has a solution.
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/comment/childcare-worker-betrayal-worsens-gender-gap-20131125-2y69z.html
For true pay equity, just Add-A-Penis. That's all it takes. No more talent, no more hours, no more experience. Just a penis.
The Abbott Government is reneging on childcare, wants to renege on Gonski reforms; and is about to launch an onslaught on ordinary Australians with the Commission of Audit. These moves will put the lives and incomes of ordinary Australians at risk - and we know that those on the lowest incomes are women."

 If you notice, right at the left hand bottom of the picture, we can see that they source the Australian Bureau of Statistics  yet when we looked into the data, we find out that Destroy the Joint lied by omission on the data and this is exactly what he discovered:

"b) Salary data may include additional payments such as overtime and bonuses. Figures therefore do not necessarily reflect award rates. An example is the case of medical graduates, whose base salary is increased markedly by overtime payments."

"The differences in overall median starting salaries between males and females can be partly explained in terms of the differing enrolment profiles of males and females. However, there are many other factors that can influence starting salary differences. While males and females may have studied in the same field, differing employment factors such as occupation, type and location of the employer, or the hours worked, can also have an impact on the earnings. (Endnote 2)"

"Analysis of differences between median starting salaries for male and female graduates should be performed with caution, as some fields of study (e.g. Optometry, Dentistry, Earth Sciences) tend to have low response numbers, and the difference obtained from the AGS may not actually exist for the overall graduate population"

And in fields like Earth Science, Physical Science, Computer Science, Engineering, Social Sciences women are actually out-earning men in starting salaries:

 As always, the feminist movement has to lie about the data and hide important information to have their fear-mongering sold.

Norma "Jane Roe" McCorvey lied about being Raped, Never had an Abortion and is a Pro-Life Activist.

    In case you didn't known, Norma MCorvey, the famous feminist icon whose case "Roe vs Wade" (based on her pseudonym) was used to legalize abortion, lied about her rape which caused her to become pregnant. She also has become a pro-life activist and she actually never had an abortion. Here's an interview she had with CNN where she reveals she has since become a pro life activist and was treated like an dumb mascot by the feminists who exploited her and then discarded her. Pay close attention on how dishonest and cowardly feminist groups are once one of their icons has a change of heart:

"Once an abortion-rights supporter, the 50-year-old McCorvey has switched sides: She's now a vocal anti-abortion activist. She has started a ministry called Roe No More to fight against abortion rights with the aim of creating a mobile counseling center for pregnant women in Dallas. 

The case was appealed to the Supreme Court, which handed down its controversial ruling on January 22, 1973. The decision legalized the right to an abortion in all 50 states and sparked a political debate that remains charged to this day.  

However, McCorvey, who was 21 when the case was filed and was on her third pregnancy, never had an abortion and gave birth to a girl, who was given up for adoption.

In a 1997 CNN interview, McCorvey blamed violence at women's clinics on the abortion-rights camp.
'I personally think it's the pro-abortion people who are doing this to collect on their insurance, so they can go out and build bigger and better killing centers,' she said.

Abortion-rights advocates were not so happy about the change of heart by the woman who symbolized a woman's right to have an abortion.
Sarah Weddington, the attorney who along with Linda Coffee represented the plaintiffs, now says she would have picked a different plaintiff, who might have better represented the case.

Coffee said she and Weddington met McCorvey via another attorney who specialized in adoptions. Coffee doesn't remember McCorvey having any hesitancy about wanting an abortion.

Asked why she thought McCorvey changed her mind, Weddington said, "She's the only one who can answer that," then refused to comment further about McCorvey. 

But McCorvey says that attitude validates her belief that abortion is wrong. 'If they don't care about me, how can they possibly care about anyone else?' she said.

When McCorvey announced her change of heart on the issue, Kate Michelman, president of the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League, said in a statement: The Roe vs. Wade decision 'isn't about any single individual. It is about the freedom of all women to make reproductive decisions free from government intrusion.'

Michelman, through a spokesman, declined to be interviewed for this story.
Coffee said she last saw McCorvey when the television movie about the case was made in the late 1980s.

'Perhaps she may have felt left out by some of the pro-choice groups in connection with the ongoing debate," she said.
That is exactly what McCorvey says about the pro-choice leaders. 'They could have been nice to me instead of treating me like an idiot,' she said."

    Look at how quickly feminists sold out their own icon and considered her a traitor who should have just have followed "the party's line" in this case. This is how much feminists really respect women with agency.

An in another interview reported by The News Journal ,she admits she made up the rape story in a fit of anger:

 

Whether you are pro or anti, the fact remains that this is another instance where feminists shaped our society by exploiting another woman yet again, based on lies and omission, and then discarded this woman when she came out opposing their views. This is how much they love women supposedly though. Norma McCorvey is actually trying to get the decision of the Supreme Court overturned:

Monotheistic Religions Had Certain Restrictions on Female Sexuality due to Paternity Issues, not Misogyny

      

      A study dating back to 2012 that never got media attention titled "Religion as a means to assure paternity" reveals that certain religious and communal restrictions on women were due not to oppress and control them as feminists would have you believe, but it was due to paternity issues and cuckoldery problems that could arise if not holding women accountable for their sexuality as we do men:

"The sacred texts of five world religions (Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, and Judaism) use similar belief systems to set limits on sexual behavior. We propose that this similarity is a shared cultural solution to a biological problem: namely male uncertainty over the paternity of offspring. 

Furthermore, we propose the hypothesis that religious practices that more strongly regulate female sexuality should be more successful at promoting paternity certainty. Using genetic data on 1,706 father–son pairs, we tested this hypothesis in a traditional 

African population in which multiple religions (Islam, Christianity, and indigenous) coexist in the same families and villages. We show that the indigenous religion enables males to achieve a significantly (P = 0.019) lower probability of cuckoldry (1.3% versus 2.9%) by enforcing the honest signaling of menstruation, but that all three religions share tenets aimed at the avoidance of extrapair copulation. 

Our findings provide evidence for high paternity certainty in a traditional African population, and they shed light on the reproductive agendas that underlie religious patriarchy."

   

Feminists balk, but there was a good reason after all for the existence of these religious rituals that appear, superficially to the comically stunted feminist mind, to be relics from an antediluvian past. Modernists think they can ignore the wisdom of their ancestors without consequence.

40% of College Age Women Have Admitted They Meant "Yes" When They Told a Man "No"

        40% of college age women have admitted that at least once in their life they meant "yes" when they told a potential sexual partner "no", but the feminist movement will tell you that women never send mixed messages and "no means no" all the time.

The same page in this book shows research that shows a part of women continued dating the men they later accused of rape, which pretty much confirms to us about the nature of these cases of women claiming false rape:

    
     
Source:  "Evolutionary Psychology and Violence: A Primer for Policymakers and Public Policy Advocates"
    
     Since then, not a single replication or investigation on this data has been done. What are they hiding?

Florida N.O.W. The State's Most Powerful Feminist Lobby Group Lies About Shared Parenting Bill During Opposition

The Florida National Organization for Women, the most powerful feminist lobby group in the state, has been lying continuously about the stated goals and intentions of SB Bill 668 and claiming that the bill mandates shared parenting in all circumstances after a divorce.

They are assuming the public and especially their feminist supporters will not read the actual bill to see what it says and this has enabled them to get away with this lie. This is not the first time The National Organization for Women has used this tactic before in its opposition to shared parenting. They have used the same lie repeatedly in several states to deny fathers equal time with their children after divorce. Here's the organization's deceptive statement on the bill. Quote:

"Press Release from Terry Sanders, President of Florida NOW:

Alimony bill bad for Florida women... Florida National Organization for Women demands Governor Scott veto the Alimony Bill... 

Another egregious injustice in the bill is the attempt to force 50/50 timesharing on all families regardless of the circumstances.

Child custody belongs completely outside of any alimony ‘reform’ legislation. The individual needs of the family and child should be the leading consideration by judges when deciding custody, not a generic formula that puts the child’s welfare at risk."

Ok now let's look on pages 17-19 of the legislation to see what the actual bill says. Quote:

"The court shall order that the parental responsibility for a minor child be shared by both parents unless the court finds that shared parental responsibility would be detrimental to the child...
If the court determines that shared parental responsibility would be detrimental to the child, it may order sole parental responsibility...

Whether or not there is a conviction of any offense of domestic violence or child abuse or the existence of an injunction for protection against domestic violence, the court shall consider evidence of domestic violence or child abuse as evidence of detriment to the child...

The court shall order sole parental responsibility for a minor child to one parent, with or without time-sharing with the other parent if it is in the best interests of the minor child...

A determination of parental  responsibility, a parenting plan, or a time-sharing schedule may 524 not be modified without a showing of a substantial, material, and unanticipated change in circumstances and a determination that the modification is in the best interests of the child.

Determination of the best interests of the child shall be made by evaluating all of the factors affecting the welfare and interests of the particular minor child and the circumstances of that family"
Here is NOW's statement juxtaposed side by side what the bill ACTUALLY says in image form.

So notice that nowhere in the bill does it say that children MUST spend an equal amount of time with the father regardless of the best interests of the child! This is a malicious lie by The National Organization for Women!