Monday, March 27, 2017

Women Proposed a Bachelor Tax and Forced Military Service Act in 1707


Since during in 1707, women were demanding bachelors to be taxed in order to force men to marry women and become unwilling white knights and providers. This is how women were oppressed during the height of the Western patriarchy. 


This is more exposure on the hidden history and the lies your teachers told you. The following quotes come from the book " Female Grievances: Dialogues between two Young Ladies concerning Love and Marriage":

"Eliza: Amongst all the female grievances we have hitherto debated there still remains one we have not yet touch’d upon. There are an abundance of bachelors who, thro’ a cowardly apprehension of the cares and troubles of the marry’d state, are so fearful of entering into it, that they would rather run the hazard of damning their souls with the repeated sin of fornication, than they will honestly engage in Wedlock to procreate within those reasonable bounds which the united laws of both God and man have both religiously appointed: Therefore methinks it would well become the care of a Parliament to redress this grievance, so very hurtful to the Kingdom in general, as well as to our sex in particular, by some compulsory law that should enforce Marriage upon all single sinners who otherwise will never keep a cow of their own whilst a quart of milk is to be brought for a penny.'
 Mariana: 'I’ll assure you i like your thoughts very well, for if we consider rightly, we can allow bachelors to be no other than drones in the great-hive of the Common-wealth, that enjoy without reason, the advantage of marry’d peoples labours, in having their liberties and estates secur’d by the loss of other men’s lives, and will not be industrious to repair from their own loins the native strength of the Kingdom, for tho’ they have not continence enough to forebear the pleasure, yet the liberty they take is with such common strumpets, who by their debaucheries and distempers, are render’d wholly incapable of producing any serviceable fruits of their sinful labours. Therefore pray let us lay our heads together and consult of some proposals that might move our Senate to a wise consideration of this weighty matter.'
Eliza: 'Pray, cousin, do you begin and propose one clause and I another, and so we’ll proceed till we have digested our project into so many several heads, that may be an ease to the Senate if ever we should hereafter petition the House to bring in a Bill for the Advancement of the Church and the suppression of Vice, and the improvement of the native strength of Her Majesties Kingdom in a lawful way.
Mariana: With all my heart; you would have me begin, so accordingly I’ll proceed to the business, vis:
'That every bachelor above the age of twenty, and childless widower under the age of fifty, shall be obliged to marry within the circle of one year, commencing from the date of the Act, or else be liable to be press’d into the Sea or Land Service (after the expiration of the Term limited) when ever Her Majesties Forces shall need a further recruit.'

Eliza: That their personal effects shall be all sequester’d by the government, and be distributed by an Almoner for that purpose, into the hands of so many trustees, chosen out of every Parish, for the better supporting and maintaining all such poor children as have lost their fathers in defence of the Kingdom, and the overplus to be disposed of amongst those miserable husbands who are plagued with scolding wives and smoky houses. 
Mariana: 'That an alms house shall be built and endow’d for the reception of all such childless widowers and bachelors as shall, by reason of their low stature, crookedness, weakness, or any other infirmities whatsoever, be judg’d unfit for His Majesty’s Service; and that every such widower or bachelor shall be allowed one warm frize gown every year with a yellow badge upon the right arm, upon which shall be stamped an Ape in a string, and under shall be engraven this motto': 

'Who dies an old maid
leads apes when she’s dead;
But he that hates wiving
shall lead ’em whilst living.'
'That every single member shall have a convenient apartment to himself, with a bed, two pair of coarse sheets, one leathern chair, one earthen candlestick, a green chamber-pot, and a little grate, and every ten of them shall have an old woman to wait upon ’em, and to hand ’em their water-gruel, barley-broth, turnips, carrots and potatoes; for that they shall not be allow’d any other food than soop, herbs and roots, because they have forfeited the Liberty of an Englishman, by not loving the flesh in a righteous way, therefore they ought not to indulge their vicious appetites.'
Eliza: 'O sye, Madam, should we put such a cruel article upon the poor gentlemen it would be constru’d as downright tyranny, beyond all president.'
Mariana: 'I am sorry to see you so tender of those who are so cruel to us, whoever refuses out of obstinacy to comply with the Term has resolved himself into a state of insufficiency, choosing rather to suffer than to marry; therefore we ought to consider them as much superanuated as to our sex, as if he were fourscore, but no infirmity ought to be allowed a good reason against a man’s marrying; for tho’ he is unable to get children, he is nevertheless able to father ’em; therefore, I think, all those that stand out in contempt of wedlock, cannot be dealt with too severely.'
Eliza: 'Truly, cousin, upon second thoughts I must agree with you that they cannot be use’d to hardly. But, I doubt the Parliament will expect we’ll be setting forth the danger of celibacy to a nation as the chief motive to induce ’em to take our other proposals into their wise consideration.'
Mariana: That’s well thought on; but we must be very brief, for the Members of Parliament hate long things, tho’ we women are said to love ’em; therefore let us begin and help one another to concisely set forth the dangers of celibacy.' "



Tuesday, February 28, 2017

The Claim That Rape Is The Most Underreported Crime Is A Myth

I've been examining this often-repeated claim that rape is the most underreported crime and so I stumbled upon the actual US Bureau of Justice Statistics actual numbers on the rate of unreported crimes.

The screenshot below, from their statistics, clearly shows that several crimes are more likely to go underreported than rape, and in fact, some of the numbers vastly outnumber the numbers for rape.
Those numbers are taken from pg 7 of their publication "Criminal Victimization, 2015"



Do a quick google search for the phrase "rape is the most underreported crime" and you'll get 10 pages-worth of people lying and saying that it's the most underreported crime. Also as of this writing, I was unable to find anyone debunking this myth. 

Friday, February 10, 2017

Men "Need to Adapt" to Alarming Rates of Job Scarcity in Male Oriented Fields According to "Experts"

Male oriented fields in the job market have been on steady decline while female has been on the rise; some of the reasons being education is not veered towards helping boys succeed, but the solution according to the mangina "expert"? Men need to suck it up and adapt, and despite many fields being female dominated, they are still suffer wage discrimination. Sounds plausible to me:
"Opportunities in female-dominated industries have continued to expand, Swartz says, but men have not been gravitating toward those jobs. 
Nearly 200,000 jobs were created in the health care and social service industries over the past four years in Canada. Yet in 2016, only 10 per cent of registered nurses and 12 per cent of health care aides were men. 
'It's sociocultural,' Swartz said. "There is still an attitude that we leave those jobs for women — men don't do those kinds of jobs.' 
There has been little to no effort to attract men to these positions or recruit them into training programs, but perhaps an even bigger barrier is the wage gap.
'In a lot of these female occupations, they are not really paid well,' Swartz said. 'If you lost a high-paying job, you don't want to move too far down the ladder. We still have wage discrimination in the labour market.' 
Swartz says boys and men need to start thinking about alternative career options or "'his will continue to be a problem for an entire gender.The problem, he says, starts in school. 
And it's not confined to Canada. An OECD report in 2012 showed that 15-year-old boys were underachieving in basic proficiency in math, reading or science in every OECD country."
http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/business/men-boys-falling-behind-1.3962316

Friday, January 27, 2017

The Courts' Stated Policy Were Agaisnt Invasion of Privacy in Domestic Disputes, No Matter Who Was to Blame.

Despite what the feminist movement is telling us and despite what most people believe the courts did not condone violence against women, in fact they regularly intervened when a husband severely abused his wife.

But their stated policy was that they refused to intervene in the privacy of the home for minor physical altercations between husbands and wives REGARDLESS of who the perpetrator was. This is the verdict from a Supreme Court Decision in 1870 from North Carolina. I know this is long-winded but please take the time to read it:

"It will be observed that the ground upon which we have put this decision is not that the husband has the right to whip his wife much or little; but that we will not interfere with family government in trifling cases. We will no more interfere where the husband whips the wife than where the wife whips the husband; and yet we would hardly be supposed to hold that a wife has a right to whip her husband.

We will not inflict upon society the greater evil of raising the curtain upon domestic privacy, to punish the lesser evil of trifling violence. Two boys under fourteen years of age fight upon the playground, and yet the courts will take no notice of it, not for the reason that boys have the right to fight, but because the interests of society require that they should be left to the more appropriate discipline of the school room and of home. It [**10] is not true that boys have a right to fight; nor is it true that a husband has a right to whip his wife."





http://faculty.uml.edu/sgallagher/StatevRhodes.htm

Saturday, January 7, 2017

Mothers Enjoy Expensive Gifts, Trips While Fathers get Collect Calls on Their Respective Holidays

In the so-called patriarchal society we supposedly live in, mothers get luxurious gifts, phone calls and taken on trips on Mother's Day, while dear old dads get collect calls on their own dime and the children just sit on the couch to watch the game with them on Father's Day:
" 'Dad tends to be more low-maintenance than mom,' says Tracy Mullin, president and CEO of the National Retail Federation, a Washington (D.C.) trade association for retailers. 'While moms love to receive luxury items such as jewelry or a trip to the spa, dads are happy with an afternoon barbecue or watching the ball game without distraction.

It gets better. Children often call dad to send their love but do so on his dime: Father's Day traditionally marks the year's busiest collect-call day for AT&T. And those who remember to send greeting cards do so in significantly smaller numbers. Hallmark sold 152 million Mother's Day cards this year but expects to unload only 95 million for Father's Day. According to BIGresearch, women -- who make the most purchases for either dads or husbands -- tend to head to discount stores to find that perfect gift for dad. Ouch!"


Revealing Study Suggests Circumcision Causes Urethral Stricture Diseases.

The hazards of male genital mutilation is further revealed in a study from Department of Epidemiology Research in Denmark leaves boys and men at higher risks for urethral stricture diseases, urinary tract infections and even damage to bladder or kidney function:




Here are some of the symptom and possible complications from USD:

"Symptoms include:

Abnormal strength and direction of urine stream
Bed wetting
Bleeding (hematuria) at end of urination
Discomfort with urination or straining with urination
Incontinence (day or night)
Visible narrow opening in boys

Possible Complications

Complications may include:

Abnormal urine stream
Blood in the urine
Frequent urination
Painful urination
Urinary incontinence
Urinary tract infections
Damage to bladder or kidney function in severe cases"

Saturday, December 31, 2016

Mainstream Media's Dishonest Collusion Against University of Minnesota's Football Players.

      Ten football players from the University of Minnesota's Gophers were suspended in September over a sexual assault accusation by a female student and her mother. Despite finding no evidence that there was actually assault in the report, (quite the contrary as we will further demonstrate) the University and the media still put these students on blast claiming that she was more "believable" over a redacted (censored) report that they kept private and didn't want to disclose.  The original report is over 80 pages, but after they redacted it, it was released as a 20 pages version of the same report. What were they hiding?


Here are a few media sources basically copying and pasting from each other trying to paint these students as guilt and nowhere do they mention the fact that this girl basically lied, which we will share in this blog article, so the reader can verify that this is yet another case of regret group sex by the female.


Here is a report by USNews:

"The school suspended the 10 players after completing its own investigation, the results of which it kept private, citing federal privacy laws. But a local TV station published a redacted copy of the 82-page report which quoted the woman as saying she believed 10 to 20 men had sex with her, though she was not certain. She told university investigators she was too traumatized to clearly remember events.
The report concluded that the victim's account of that night was more credible than the players it interviewed, and said some players tried to impede the university's investigation into the incident."
Here's one by The Chicago Tribune's report, which is identical to the previous one, and here is the ESPN report, yet another identical one.
None of these mainstream media reports provide a link to the court documents(although I was able to obtain them doing some extensive searching from a local news station).

The media also conveniently leaves out the fact that the accuser's mother was the one who initially claimed her daughter was raped and then the so-called victim seems to have been pressured to report it to the police by her mom.

Here are the damning screenshots from the actual report where we can see that the media and University are lying intentionally:














After opening up the court documents in the University of Minnesota sexual assault case, the first red flag is that the woman who claims she was sexually assaulted did not want to file a report and her mother was the one who called the police to try to file the report.

So it could be a case of where her mother found out she was having consensual group sex with these football players and she got embarrassed and claimed she was raped.




She admits they were flirting with her, she explains in detail about how she still decided to go back to one of the guy's apartment knowing he was interested in her. Now how can she remember all of this stuff if she claims she was too intoxicated to consent to sex? Also why can't she "remember" how many of the guys she slept with?






So she gets onto the guy's bed and magically she loses her memory and doesn't remember how her clothes got off, but she does remember giving him/them blowjobs but doesn't explain how any of them supposedly forced her to give them blowjobs. She admits she was trying to get him/them to ejaculate.




Here's that magical selective memory at work again. She says she might have been held down by the guys but doesn't remember whether it was real or just her fear that invented the memory.




SHE THEN AGREED TO GO BACK TO THE ROOM WITH THE GUY WHO SHE CLAIMS RAPED HER AGAIN AND HE ASKED HER IF SHE WAS COOL WITH THE GROUP SEX. If she's in "fear" of these guys then why would she go back to one of their rooms?





Here we go. She admits on pg 13 that she sat on the couch in between the guys and started "flirting" with them. Notice how they don't go into detail about what she said specifically while flirting with them? Sneaky sneaky.






She has now changed her mind and said that the sex with some of the boys "might" have been consensual but with the others it wasn't. Boy oh boy you gotta love this chick's selective memory.




Still on page 13 here and LOOK at how the police are white knighting for this chick and basically giving her the go ahead to change her story. 



Ok pay close attention to this part of the documents. In this part they describe what happened in the video footage of the incident captured by one of the football players. The police say she doesn't appear to be too intoxicated to not know what's going on, she doesn't appear to be objecting to any of the sex and the entire video is sexually playful on both ends. This important piece of the story was also left out of the media reports! 





The police then go on to describe the part of the video where she is giving one of the players a blowjob while the other player is penetrating her from behind and they say it appears to be consensual once again. She isn't slurring her words or objecting to anything in the video and is fully conscious of what is going on.



Ok the football player that she admits she probably had consensual sex with said that when she first started flirting with them she brought up the idea of having a threesome with three guys and so they offered to take her up to their apartment which she then consented to.

This is what the accuser meant when she said she "flirted" with them but strangely the police didn't seem to want to make her go into detail about what she said when she flirted with them. 





The football player by the name of Carlton showed the cops his video footage of the incident and the cops agreed that it did appear that she was conscious and a willing participant in the sex during the entire video.

 Even after reviewing the redacted information itself, we can read as to why the mainstream media concealed all the major facts we now know about this case and how this young woman lied about these young men, and still the media and the report itself, keep referring to her "victim".  

It makes one wonder what the entire 82 pages report actually reveals when the 20 pages that were censored pretty tells us she consented to everything that happened



Even after reviewing the redacted information itself, we can read as to why the mainstream media concealed all the major facts we now know about this case and how this young woman lied about these young men, and still the media and the report itself, keep referring to her "victim".


It makes one wonder what the entire 82 pages report actually reveals when the 20 pages that were censored pretty tells us she consented to everything that happened