Two Thirds of Women felt fairly Treated Compared to Men in 1970

      Two thirds of women when asked in 1970, said they were treated as equally as men despite the myth perpetuated by mainstream feminism about women being hopelessly oppressed in the United Stated back then. It makes sense if you recall that the men were drafted into the Vietnam war at that time overseas getting their legs blown off.

Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/109274976/2-Out-of-3-Women-Felt-They-Were-Treated-as-Fairly-as-Men-in-1970

Adolf "Handsome" Hitler was a Hit with Women

    Handsome Adolf Hitler is adored by women shown by The Pittsburgh Press Feb 6, 1933.

This is just to show that historically, it wasn't just men who supported the rise of the Third Reich, but women lusting after powerful Nazis as well.

The Milwaukee Journal March 31, 1937 shows women fawning over handsome Adolf Hitler as a sex symbol:

"Handsome Hitler Rates High as Ladies Man", The Milwaukee Journal - Dec 7, 1934

   

The Pittsburgh Press in 1930 talking about how women were Hitler's most loyal supporters even when everyone else deserted him early on.

"The Women Made Him" The Pittsburgh Press - Oct 5, 1930

But they tell us in school that he just came out of nowhere as this evil unforeseen menace that the heroic Allies had to defeat. I'm not debating that he was evil, but the idea that only men supported this psychopath is absurd.

Canadian Feminist Pioneer Emily Murphy Hailed as a "Hero" Wanted Mentally Disabled Women Sterilized

       Canadian Feminist pioneer Emily Murphy is hailed as a "hero for today" on the University of Alberta's website despite them including her call for the forced sterilization of handicapped women. 

How can you be touted as a hero for the rights of all women and yet help bring about the Government forcibly sterilizing women you label unfit? It's a similar pattern with many of the celebrated first wave feminist pioneers prior to the 1950s:

"One of the painful experiences of the magisterial life is to take from an insane and violent woman the little baby to which she has given birth during her parole; knowing that someday the child, in turn, is likely to be a patient, owing to the fact that its future was mortgaged before it was born. 

Awhile ago, in one of our institutions for the care of the aged, it was found that sixteen of the women were feeble-minded and that these had produced 116 mentally deficient children. 

Enquiring into this same matter of descent, it was found in Alberta that out of 3200 persons who had been treated for insanity, nearly 4000 children had been born. It is estimated that one out of every five of these children—that is to say 800 of them—will come ultimately as patients to a mental hospital.... It is quite true that there are tragedies that go on and on. This is one of them. 

Perhaps, after all, there is not so much credit in being a mother as being fitted to be one"

Rockefeller and Ford Foundation Fund Feminist Women's International Meeting of "Radicals" 1975

Here's more evidence of how entrenched and in cahoots feminism is with the powers that be, that according to gender studies professors in universities right now will tell you were hellbent on oppressing women with white male patriarchal and capitalist hegemony:

They had such multi-nationalists backing them up but a NOW representative has the audacity to say that the group had no power. That's to show you how far back feminists were damseling and claiming no large influence in society, despite their influence.

Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/105717710/Rockefeller-and-Ford-Foundation-Fund-Feminist-Women-s-International-Meeting-of-Radicals-1975

     

Rockefeller Foundation Helped Fund Feminist Press 1972

           In 1972, The Feminist Press received funds from the "patriarchal" Rockefellers in order to indoctrinate school teachers to brainwash children with feminism:


                                             

Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/105715545/Rockefeller-Family-Funds-the-Feminist-Press-in-1972#download   

        So, this yet ample proof of yet another collusion of feminism and the so-called patriarchal power structures. Do you smell the stench of corpses and skeletons inside feminists' closet yet? Of how misandric the entire system, and not just "feminists" is?

1970's Virginia Slims Ads Claim Women are Superior to Men

          "Feminist" Virginia Slims Advertisement from the 1970s telling women "You've come a long way baby, to get where you got to today".  In Stanford Research into the Impact of Tobacco Advertising, we can read how women's liberation type ads helped get women hooked on cigarettes as a way to oppose the patriarchy and show women as men's superiors and adversaries:

One of the most common techniques tobacco companies employ in order to target women is women's liberation. Specifically, these advertisements show a woman in a position of power over a man, while being careful to keep the power-play light, carefree, and a bit flirtatious. The ads are prudent, hoping not to offend anyone while appearing to 'take sides,' so to speak, with women. Often, these ads distract from the position of power Big Tobacco itself holds over both sexes, by pitting women against men instead of against Big Tobacco. "

Supreme Court Case Admits Justice Policy Creates Gender Conflict

In the Koira vs Metro Car Wash Supreme Court case the court actually admits that justice system policy keeps men and women at each other's throats: :

"Men and women alike suffer from the stereotypes perpetrated by sex-based differential treatment. (See Kanowitz, "Benign" Sex Discrimination: Its Troubles and Their Cure (1980) 31 Hastings L.J. 1379, 1394; Comment, Equal Rights Provisions: The Experience Under State Constitutions (1977) 65 Cal.L.Rev. 1086, 1106-1107.) When the law "emphasizes irrelevant differences between men and women[,] [it] cannot help influencing the content and the tone of the social, as well as the legal, relations between the sexes. ...


As long as organized legal systems, at once the most respected [40 Cal.3d 35] and most feared of social institutions, continue to differentiate sharply, in treatment or in words, between men and women on the basis of irrelevant and artificially created distinctions, the likelihood of men and women coming to regard one another primarily as fellow human beings and only secondarily as representatives of another sex will continue to be remote.


When men and women are prevented from recognizing one another's essential humanity by sexual prejudices, nourished by legal as well as social institutions, society as a whole remains less than it could otherwise become." (Kanowitz, Women and the Law (1969) p. 4.)
Whether or not these defendants consciously based their discounts on sex stereotypes, the practice has traditionally been of that character. For example, in Com., Pa. Liquor Control Bd. v. Dobrinoff (1984) 80 Pa.Cmwlth. 453 [471 A.2d 941], the trial court relied on just such a stereotype in upholding a tavern's cover charge distinction based on sex.



The court suggested that the purpose of the discount was "'chivalry and courtesy to the fair sex.'" (Id., at p. 943.) The appellate court held, however, that a variance in admission charge based "solely upon a difference in gender, having no legitimate relevance in the circumstances" violated the Pennsylvania Human Relation Act's prohibition against sex discrimination. (Ibid.)


Similarly, in striking down the New York Yankees "Ladies' Day" promotion, the New York State Human Rights Appeal Board observed that "the stereotyped characterizations of a woman's role in society that prevailed at the inception of 'Ladies' Day' in 1876" were outdated and no longer valid "in a modern technological society where women and men are to be on equal footing as a matter of public policy." (Abosh v. New York Yankees, Inc. (1972) No. CPS-25284, Appeal No. 1194, reprinted in Babcock et al., Sex Discrimination and the Law, supra, at pp. 1069, 1070.)


With all due respect, the Washington Supreme Court also succumbed to sexual stereotyping in upholding the Seattle Supersonics' "Ladies' Night." (MacLean v. First North. Industries of America, supra, 635 P.2d at p. 684.) The court found that the discount was reasonable because, inter alia, "women do not manifest the same interest in basketball that men do." (Ibid.) fn. 16


This sort of class-based generalization as a justification for differential treatment is precisely the type of practice prohibited by the Unruh Act. (See [40 Cal.3d 36] O'Connor v. Village Green Owners Assn., supra, 33 Cal.3d at p. 794; Marina Point, supra, 30 Cal.3d at pp. 739-740.) "[T]he Unruh Civil Rights Act prohibits all forms of stereotypical discrimination." (San Jose Country Club Apartments v. County of Santa Clara (1982) 137 Cal.App.3d 948, 952 [187 Cal.Rptr. 493].) These sex-based discounts impermissibly perpetuate sexual stereotypes"