The Journal of Family Violence Demonizes Households Headed by Fathers as Prone to Violence

In the "Journal of Family Violence" published by the Library of Congress the heterosexual family is called an unsafe place for women because of the male patriarchy. And yes they actually use the word "patriarchy". This is yet another example of institutionalized radical feminism:

"Most Americans cling to an image of the family that includes tranquility, happiness, love between members, shared norms and values, and above all else, safety. Recent investigations, however, have been making it increasingly clear that the home is a dangerous place..."


In a culture such as ours, where male violence is largely approved and condoned and "masculine" ideals include aggressiveness, almost any woman can become a victim...Other researchers believe that violence against wives is historically structured into marriage under patriarchy"


http://books.google.com/books?id=VPPapvrJsTcC&pg=PA3&lpg=PA3&dq=most+americans+cling+to+an+image+of+the+family+that+includes+tranquility+family+violence&source=bl&ots=d2f4nO5d3H&sig=leIkJKTpN1QBohbDrLs7BGqbRW4&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ZUhdUvD6C6e72wXYr4GQDQ&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=most%20Americans%20cling%20to%20an%20image%20of%20the%20family%20that%20includes%20tranquility%2C%20happiness%2C%20love%20between%20members%2C%20shared%20norms%20and%20values%2C%20and%20above%20all%20else%2C%20safety.%20Recent%20investigations%2C%20however%2C%20have%20been%20making%20it%20increasingly%20clear%20that%20the%20home%20is%20a%20dangerous%20place&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=VPPapvrJsTcC&pg=PA247&lpg=PA247&dq="in+a+culture+such+as+ours,+where+male+violence+is+largely+approved+and+condoned"+family+violence&source=bl&ots=d2f4nO5j-F&sig=hOLpW9_Q33bF_PjXzTWPqMb1zcw&hl=en&sa=X&ei=k0pdUoebF-Lh2wWJ6oBQ&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22in%20a%20culture%20such%20as%20ours%2C%20where%20male%20violence%20is%20largely%20approved%20and%20condoned%22%20family%20violence&f=false

Los Angeles County's Corrupt Child Support System is Hellbent on Destroying Fathers

"All it takes in Los Angeles County to be declared the father of a child — and therefore on the hook for any and all back child support, with interest — is for a mother to provide your name, the Department of Child Support Services to send you a summons choked in legalese, and for you to fail to return it within 30 days.

Such "default judgments"— which amount to 45% of all paternity-establishments in the state of California in 2005 (down from an appalling 68% five years previous) — are notoriously hard to undo once the wheels of justice are set in motion (greased by states' financial incentives from the federal government to establish as many paternities as possible).

It happened recently to a 19-year-old Palmdale kid (said to be the father of four). It's happened to untold numbers of gay men, and women with manly first names. It happened to a good friend of mine, whose never-used Christian name (Anthony Pierce) was uttered by a woman he'd never met in Northern California, thus putting him on the hook for a 10-year-old."

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oew-welch21aug21,0,123074.story

A Black Man Destroyed by the Crooked Child Support System Over a Child That Wasn't his

"Tony Jackson, a working class black man with a wife and two kids, got a bill from Gil Garcetti's deadbeat dad squad saying, he owes $13,000 in back child support, for a child, that he would soon prove, was not his. Jackson took a DNA test at a lab the court picked. It showed he was definitely not the father. Tough luck.

The law says anyone who receives an official court notice saying he owes child support has thirty days to respond--thirty days!--and if you don't respond in thirty days, you're considered "in default" and must pay support until the child is eighteen. Jackson was named by a woman he used to date, who, in order to qualify for welfare, had to name somebody as the father of her child.

So she picked Tony Jackson, even though he wasn't the father. Jackson didn't respond to the court order within thirty days, because he swears he never got the notice. He says he learned about it after it was sent to a former employer who never forwarded it to him.

Still, he was ordered to pay child support for a child everyone, even Gil Garcetti, agreed was not his. When I met Tony Jackson, he was a wreck. On the verge of suicide, I feared. He cried during our conversation. He said he couldn't take his own two kids out to a restaurant for a meal. He couldn't afford it because the court was taking the child support out of his paycheck before he even got it."

http://books.google.com/books?id=SX2uNnWbvEQC&pg=PA139&lpg=PA139&dq=Tony+Jackson%2C+a+working+class+black+man+with+a+wife+and+two+kids%2C+got+a+bill+from+Gil+Garcetti%27s+deadbeat+dad+squad+saying&source=bl&ots=ptbsjna0hb&sig=K9HlbtYZtCBsKGOMdzh5OixKBkI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WFldUtL1McqikQe72oBo&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Tony%20Jackson%2C%20a%20working%20class%20black%20man%20with%20a%20wife%20and%20two%20kids%2C%20got%20a%20bill%20from%20Gil%20Garcetti's%20deadbeat%20dad%20squad%20saying&f=false

Mary Winkler's Battered Wife Defense Allows Murderer to go Free After Only 67 Days in Prison

"Mary Winkler, the Tennessee woman who shot her minister husband to death while he slept, was released back into society this week after serving just 67 days, most of it in a prison hospital. Did she get away with murder? Many think she did, including two TODAY experts, former judge and prosecutor Jeanine Pirro, and forensic psychiatrist Dr. Keith Ablow.


“You can’t give Mary Winkler, in my opinion, any kind of clean bill of health that she won’t be violent in the future,” Ablow told TODAY host Meredith Vieira on Thursday.
“I think it sends a terrible message about the criminal justice system, that you can commit a homicide and literally get away with it,” added Pirro...

During her trial in April, she claimed that she had been abused by her husband, with whom she had appeared to have an ideal marriage. She claimed not to remember getting the shotgun from a closet in their bedroom nor discharging it.
Winkler said that her husband, mortally wounded, rolled off the bed and asked her, “Why?” She said she told him she was sorry.

She was indicted on a charge of first-degree murder, but on April 19, after eight hours of deliberation, the jury found her guilty of voluntary manslaughter. On June 8, she was sentenced to 210 days in prison, with credit given for 143 days she had spent in jail the previous year before making bail. The judge allowed her to spend 60 of the remaining 67 days of her sentence in a mental health facility.


“Justice was definitely not served here,” Pirro told Vieira. “You had a preacher, who by all accounts was loved in his community, who was shot in the back while he slept. You have a woman who says she was abused with no history, no shred of evidence.”

http://www.today.com/id/20296389#.Ul085xewWK8

Family Feud Makes Fun of Domestic Violence Against Men

"On an episode of the game show Family Feud in early October 2006, the host asked contestants: "Name something a man hopes his wife never hits him with?" No one seemed to have any problem with the question, and answers included "pan, skillet, baseball bat, tennis racquet, her fist." Despite the mean-spirited nature of the question, a good laugh was had by all without the slightest hint of guilt or hypocricy"

-"Karla Marx" pg 51


But men commit almost all of the acts of domestic violence right? Sure they do.

Feminist Professor Says New Dramatic Increase in Divorces Was a Hallmark of Equality 1933

A feminist professor reacts to the news that women are initiating a heavy increase in divorces by saying that it's a good thing and that it forces men to improve in 1933. She pretty much swore and predicted that the increase in divorce would usher in a utopia of equality. Well how do you like the utopia so far folks? 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/175673557/Divorce-is-a-Weapon-for-Forcing-Men-to-Improve-Says-Feminist-Professor-1933

The False Accusation/Child Support Hell and the William Gregory Story

ABC News covers the story of William Gregory, a father who was put in prison for a false rape claim for 8 years of his life. After he was released due to DNA evidence proving his innocence he was forced to pay back child support due to the time he was unable to work. This is the form of "justice" men and fathers see in the court system today:

"William Gregory spent eight and a half years in a Kentucky Prison for a rape he did not commit — leaving his son on state child support.

But with his freedom came a twist straight out of Kafka: not only did he get no compensation, but the state then sued him for the child support it paid while he was in prison.

"At least compensate me for the time," said Gregory, who was released on account of DNA evidence. "Say 'I made a mistake. We made a mistake, and pay that man!'"

He said he had nothing when he got out of jail.

"I was sleeping on the street," Gregory said."

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121539&page=1